Abhishek Raja "Ram"

@abhishekrajaram

2 days ago

ā€¢View on Twitter

š—–š—˜š—¦š—§š—”š—§ š—”š—²š˜„ š——š—²š—¹š—µš—¶ š—„š˜‚š—¹š—¶š—»š—“ š—¼š—» š—„š—²š˜ƒš—²š—暝˜€š—² š—–š—µš—®š—暝—“š—² š—®š—»š—± š—™š—¼š—暝—²š—¶š—“š—» š—–š˜‚š—暝—暝—²š—»š—°š˜† š—˜š˜…š—½š—²š—»š—±š—¶š˜š˜‚š—暝—² šŸ“¢ š—§š—暝—¶š—Æš˜‚š—»š—®š—¹'š˜€ š—›š—²š—¹š—±: "Service tax is not payable under reverse charge for foreign currency expenses on business promotion activities where the place of supply is outside India, and payments are directly made by the appellant. Appeal allowed."

šŸ” š—™š—®š—°š˜š˜€: š—”š—½š—½š—²š—¹š—¹š—®š—»š˜: M/s Kusum Healthcare faced a service tax demand for foreign currency business promotion expenses under reverse charge for 2014-2015. š—œš˜€š˜€š˜‚š—²:Was the appellant liable to pay service tax under reverse charge for foreign currency payments related to business promotion activities?

āš–ļø š—š˜‚š—±š—“š—²š—ŗš—²š—»š˜: The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, citing prior favorable rulings, direct payments made by the appellant, exemption for print media advertisements under the negative list, and the place of supply being outside India, which exempts the services from reverse charge service tax liability. Appeal was allowed.

šŸ“œ š—–š—®š˜€š—² š—œš—»š—³š—¼š—暝—ŗš—®š˜š—¶š—¼š—»: š—§š—¶š˜š—¹š—²: M/s Kusum Healthcare Pvt. Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax š—¢š—暝—±š—²š—æ š——š—®š˜š—²: 02 March 2023 šŸ“œ This ruling reinforces the principle that reverse charge liability does not apply to services rendered outside India where the place of supply is clearly outside the country.

More from @abhishekrajaramReply on Twitter

Page created with TweetHunter

Write your own