Raja Abhishek For NIRC 2024
25 days ago
ššš¦š§šš§ š”š²š šš²š¹šµš¶ š„šš¹š¶š»š“ š¼š» š„š²š³šš»š± š¼š³ šØš»ššš¶š¹š¶šš²š± šš²š»šš®š ššæš²š±š¶š š¢ š§šµš² š§šæš¶šÆšš»š®š¹ šµš²š¹š±: "Refund of unutilized Cenvat credit lying before GST implementation cannot be claimed in cash if TRAN-1 was not filed or if Rule 5 conditions are unmet."
š šš®š°šš: šš¼šŗš½š®š»š: M/s Mahavir Metal Manufacturing Company ššššš²: Whether the appellant is entitled to a cash refund for unutilized Cenvat credit under Rule 5 or Section 140 of the CGST Act, 2017? šš°šš¶šš¶šš: The appellant, a manufacturer of umbrella parts, closed its factory in FY 2016-2017. In 2019, it filed a refund claim for unutilized Cenvat credit under Rule 5 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, without transitioning the credit through TRAN-1 under GST.
āļø ššš±š“š²šŗš²š»š: The Tribunal ruled that Rule 5 does not allow refunds for unutilized credit unless linked to exports. Cash refunds are barred under the Cenvat Credit Rules or Section 11B for non-duty-related credits. Without filing TRAN-1, credits cannot transition under GST. Late filing further invalidated the refund claim. Appeal dismissed.
šš®šš² šš»š³š¼šæšŗš®šš¶š¼š»: š§š¶šš¹š²: M/s Mahavir Metal Manufacturing Company vs. Commissioner (Appeals), Central Excise and CGST šš«ššš¦š šš£š£ššš š”š¢. 51200 OF 2022 (SM) š¢šæš±š²šæ šš®šš²: 03 May 2023 š This ruling underscores that unutilized Cenvat credit from the pre-GST era cannot be refunded in cash without satisfying Rule 5 or TRAN-1 conditions.
Page created with TweetHunter
Write your own