Raja Abhishek For NIRC 2024

@abhishekrajaram

25 days ago

ā€¢View on Twitter

š—–š—˜š—¦š—§š—”š—§ š—”š—²š˜„ š——š—²š—¹š—µš—¶ š—„š˜‚š—¹š—¶š—»š—“ š—¼š—» š—„š—²š—³š˜‚š—»š—± š—¼š—³ š—Øš—»š˜‚š˜š—¶š—¹š—¶š˜‡š—²š—± š—–š—²š—»š˜ƒš—®š˜ š—–š—暝—²š—±š—¶š˜ šŸ“¢ š—§š—µš—² š—§š—暝—¶š—Æš˜‚š—»š—®š—¹ š—µš—²š—¹š—±: "Refund of unutilized Cenvat credit lying before GST implementation cannot be claimed in cash if TRAN-1 was not filed or if Rule 5 conditions are unmet."

šŸ” š—™š—®š—°š˜š˜€: š—–š—¼š—ŗš—½š—®š—»š˜†: M/s Mahavir Metal Manufacturing Company š—œš˜€š˜€š˜‚š—²: Whether the appellant is entitled to a cash refund for unutilized Cenvat credit under Rule 5 or Section 140 of the CGST Act, 2017? š—”š—°š˜š—¶š˜ƒš—¶š˜š˜†: The appellant, a manufacturer of umbrella parts, closed its factory in FY 2016-2017. In 2019, it filed a refund claim for unutilized Cenvat credit under Rule 5 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, without transitioning the credit through TRAN-1 under GST.

āš–ļø š—š˜‚š—±š—“š—²š—ŗš—²š—»š˜: The Tribunal ruled that Rule 5 does not allow refunds for unutilized credit unless linked to exports. Cash refunds are barred under the Cenvat Credit Rules or Section 11B for non-duty-related credits. Without filing TRAN-1, credits cannot transition under GST. Late filing further invalidated the refund claim. Appeal dismissed.

š—–š—®š˜€š—² š—œš—»š—³š—¼š—暝—ŗš—®š˜š—¶š—¼š—»: š—§š—¶š˜š—¹š—²: M/s Mahavir Metal Manufacturing Company vs. Commissioner (Appeals), Central Excise and CGST š—˜š—«š—–š—œš—¦š—˜ š—”š—£š—£š—˜š—”š—Ÿ š—”š—¢. 51200 OF 2022 (SM) š—¢š—暝—±š—²š—æ š——š—®š˜š—²: 03 May 2023 šŸ“œ This ruling underscores that unutilized Cenvat credit from the pre-GST era cannot be refunded in cash without satisfying Rule 5 or TRAN-1 conditions.

More from @abhishekrajaramReply on Twitter

Page created with TweetHunter

Write your own