Raja Abhishek For NIRC 2024

@abhishekrajaram

about 1 month ago

ā€¢View on Twitter

š—–š—˜š—¦š—§š—”š—§ š—”š—²š˜„ š——š—²š—¹š—µš—¶ š—„š˜‚š—¹š—¶š—»š—“ š—¼š—» š—„š—²š—³š˜‚š—»š—± š—¼š—³ š—”š—ŗš—¼š˜‚š—»š˜ š—£š—®š—¶š—± š—£š—²š—»š—±š—¶š—»š—“ š—œš—»š˜ƒš—²š˜€š˜š—¶š—“š—®š˜š—¶š—¼š—» šŸ“¢ š—§š—µš—² š—§š—暝—¶š—Æš˜‚š—»š—®š—¹ š—µš—²š—¹š—±: "Amount deposited during investigation is considered paid under protest, and thus, eligible for refund with 12% interest from the date of deposit."

šŸ” š—™š—®š—°š˜š˜€: š—–š—¼š—ŗš—½š—®š—»š˜†: M/s. Rajendra Mittal Construction Company Pvt. Ltd. š—œš˜€š˜€š˜‚š—²: Is the appellant entitled to a refund with interest for the amount deposited during the investigation? š—”š—°š˜š—¶š˜ƒš—¶š˜š˜†: Provided works contract services; part payment made during audit, later confirmed by the Original Authority but overturned on appeal.

āš–ļø š—š˜‚š—±š—“š—²š—ŗš—²š—»š˜: The Tribunal ruled that amounts paid during investigations are treated as payments under protest, per Mafatlal Industries vs. Union of India. Since the refund was claimed promptly after the favorable order, it was considered timely. The Department was directed to refund the amount with 12% interest. Appeal allowed.

š—–š—®š˜€š—² š—œš—»š—³š—¼š—暝—ŗš—®š˜š—¶š—¼š—»: š—§š—¶š˜š—¹š—²: M/s. Rajendra Mittal Construction Company Pvt. Ltd. vs. Commissioner of CGST, Al š—¦š—˜š—„š—©š—œš—–š—˜ š—§š—”š—« š—”š—£š—£š—˜š—”š—Ÿ š—”š—¼. 51323 of 2023 š—¢š—暝—±š—²š—æ š——š—®š˜š—²: 05 July 2023 šŸ“œ This ruling underscores that deposits during investigations are refundable with interest, as they are treated as payments under protest.

More from @abhishekrajaramReply on Twitter

Page created with TweetHunter

Write your own