Raja Abhishek For NIRC 2024

@abhishekrajaram

25 days ago

ā€¢View on Twitter

š—–š—˜š—¦š—§š—”š—§ š—”š—²š˜„ š——š—²š—¹š—µš—¶ š—„š˜‚š—¹š—¶š—»š—“ š—¼š—» š—¢š—°š—²š—®š—» š—™š—暝—²š—¶š—“š—µš˜ š—®š—»š—± š—£š—暝—¼š—³š—¶š˜ š—˜š—®š—暝—»š—²š—± šŸ“¢ š—§š—µš—² š—§š—暝—¶š—Æš˜‚š—»š—®š—¹ š—µš—²š—¹š—±: "Ocean freight is not a service, and profit earned from such transactions cannot be considered consideration for service, making it not liable to service tax."

šŸ” š—™š—®š—°š˜š˜€: š—–š—¼š—ŗš—½š—®š—»š˜†: M/s. Balmer Lawrie & Co. Ltd. š—œš˜€š˜€š˜‚š—²: Whether service tax is payable on ocean freight and related charges? š—”š—°š˜š—¶š˜ƒš—¶š˜š˜†: The appellant transported cargo for Indian customers, dividing bills into freight, origin charges, destination charges, and service tax but paid service tax only on destination charges. The department demanded service tax on freight and origin charges.

āš–ļø š—š˜‚š—±š—“š—²š—ŗš—²š—»š˜: The Tribunal ruled that ocean freight is a business activity, not a service, and profits from space trading are not taxable under Section 65(19) of the Finance Act, 1994. The department's appeal was dismissed, and the appellant's appeal was allowed.

šŸ“œ š—–š—®š˜€š—² š—œš—»š—³š—¼š—暝—ŗš—®š˜š—¶š—¼š—»: š—§š—¶š˜š—¹š—²: M/s. Balmer Lawrie & Co. Ltd. vs. The Commissioner of Service Tax š—¦š—˜š—„š—©š—œš—–š—˜ š—§š—”š—« š—”š—£š—£š—˜š—”š—Ÿ š—”š—¢. 52168 of 2016 š—¢š—暝—±š—²š—æ š——š—®š˜š—²: 01 May 2023 šŸ“œ This ruling reinforces that ocean freight and profits earned from space trading are not subject to service tax.

More from @abhishekrajaramReply on Twitter

Page created with TweetHunter

Write your own