Raja Abhishek For NIRC 2024

@abhishekrajaram

13 days ago

โ€ขView on Twitter

๐—–๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—ง๐—”๐—ง ๐—ก๐—ฒ๐˜„ ๐——๐—ฒ๐—น๐—ต๐—ถ ๐—ฅ๐˜‚๐—น๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—Ÿ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐—™๐—ฒ๐—ฒ ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐—ฆ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜ƒ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฒ ๐—ง๐—ฎ๐˜… ๐—Ÿ๐—ถ๐—ฎ๐—ฏ๐—ถ๐—น๐—ถ๐˜๐˜† ๐Ÿ“ข ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ง๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ฏ๐˜‚๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—น๐—ฑ: "License fees paid to Indian Railways are not taxable as โ€˜support servicesโ€™ since they are not quid pro quo for any support. Service tax cannot be demanded on license fees."

๐Ÿ” ๐—™๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐˜๐˜€: ๐—–๐—ผ๐—บ๐—ฝ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜†: M/s Ambuj Hotels & Real Estates Pvt. Ltd. ๐—œ๐˜€๐˜€๐˜‚๐—ฒ: Whether the license fee paid by the appellant to Indian Railways is liable to service tax under the category of โ€˜support servicesโ€™? ๐—”๐—ฐ๐˜๐—ถ๐˜ƒ๐—ถ๐˜๐˜†: The appellant paid license fees to Indian Railways, allegedly as consideration for infrastructural, operational, and marketing support. Service tax was demanded under reverse charge for July 2013 to June 2017.

โš–๏ธ ๐—๐˜‚๐—ฑ๐—ด๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜: The Tribunal ruled that license fees linked to sales turnover are not quid pro quo for support services and are instead for catering authorization. As clarified by the CBIC Circular, granting licenses became taxable only after 01.04.2016. The service tax demand, interest, and penalties were set aside, and the appeal was allowed.

๐—–๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐—œ๐—ป๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป: ๐—ง๐—ถ๐˜๐—น๐—ฒ: M/s Ambuj Hotels & Real Estates Pvt. Ltd. vs. Director General of GST Intelligence ๐—ฆ๐—˜๐—ฅ๐—ฉ๐—œ๐—–๐—˜ ๐—ง๐—”๐—ซ ๐—”๐—ฃ๐—ฃ๐—˜๐—”๐—Ÿ ๐—ก๐—ข. 51712 OF 2022 ๐—ข๐—ฟ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐——๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฒ: 03 April 2023 ๐Ÿ“œ This ruling establishes that license fees linked to sales turnover, without quid pro quo for support services, are not subject to service tax before 01.04.2016.

More from @abhishekrajaramReply on Twitter

Page created with TweetHunter

Write your own