Abhishek Raja "Ram"

@abhishekrajaram

12 months ago

•View on X

š—–š—˜š—¦š—§š—”š—§ š—”š—²š˜„ š——š—²š—¹š—µš—¶ š—„š˜‚š—¹š—¶š—»š—“ š—¼š—» š—š—¼š—¶š—»š˜ š—©š—²š—»š˜š˜‚š—æš—² š—”š—“š—æš—²š—²š—ŗš—²š—»š˜š˜€ š—®š—»š—± š—¦š—²š—æš˜ƒš—¶š—°š—² š—§š—®š˜… šŸ“¢ š—§š—µš—² š—§š—æš—¶š—Æš˜‚š—»š—®š—¹ š—µš—²š—¹š—±: No service tax on joint venture revenue sharing; not a service provider-recipient relationship. Appeals against demands allowed.

šŸ” š—™š—®š—°š˜š˜€: š—”š—½š—½š—²š—¹š—¹š—®š—»š˜š˜€: M/s Divya Yoga Mandir Trust and others. š—œš˜€š˜€š˜‚š—²: The appellants are not liable for service tax on Club/Association, IPR, Transport of Goods, or Content services. š—”š—°š˜š—¶š˜ƒš—¶š˜š˜†: Revenue sharing in a joint venture and services rendered under various categories.

āš–ļø š—š˜‚š—±š—“š—²š—ŗš—²š—»š˜: The Tribunal ruled that the appellants, a trust, are exempt from service tax under Club or Association Services. Intellectual Property Rights and Transport of Goods by Road services were not taxable. Revenue sharing in joint ventures isn't taxable. Penalties under Sections 76, 77, and 78 were set aside due to lack of evidence.

šŸ“œ š—–š—®š˜€š—² š—œš—»š—³š—¼š—æš—ŗš—®š˜š—¶š—¼š—»: š—§š—¶š˜š—¹š—²: M/s Divya Yoga Mandir Trust and others vs. Commissioner of Service Tax š—¢š—æš—±š—²š—æ š——š—®š˜š—²: 23 December 2022 šŸ“œ This ruling clarifies that revenue sharing in joint ventures and activities falling under excluded categories are not subject to service tax.

More from @abhishekrajaramReply on X

Page created with TweetHunter

Write your own