
Abhishek Raja "Ram"
12 months ago
ā¢View on X
ššš¦š§šš§ š”š²š šš²š¹šµš¶ š„šš¹š¶š»š“ š¼š» šš¼š¶š»š š©š²š»šššæš² šš“šæš²š²šŗš²š»šš š®š»š± š¦š²šæšš¶š°š² š§š®š š¢ š§šµš² š§šæš¶šÆšš»š®š¹ šµš²š¹š±: No service tax on joint venture revenue sharing; not a service provider-recipient relationship. Appeals against demands allowed.
š šš®š°šš: šš½š½š²š¹š¹š®š»šš: M/s Divya Yoga Mandir Trust and others. ššššš²: The appellants are not liable for service tax on Club/Association, IPR, Transport of Goods, or Content services. šš°šš¶šš¶šš: Revenue sharing in a joint venture and services rendered under various categories.
āļø ššš±š“š²šŗš²š»š: The Tribunal ruled that the appellants, a trust, are exempt from service tax under Club or Association Services. Intellectual Property Rights and Transport of Goods by Road services were not taxable. Revenue sharing in joint ventures isn't taxable. Penalties under Sections 76, 77, and 78 were set aside due to lack of evidence.
š šš®šš² šš»š³š¼šæšŗš®šš¶š¼š»: š§š¶šš¹š²: M/s Divya Yoga Mandir Trust and others vs. Commissioner of Service Tax š¢šæš±š²šæ šš®šš²: 23 December 2022 š This ruling clarifies that revenue sharing in joint ventures and activities falling under excluded categories are not subject to service tax.
Page created with TweetHunter
Write your own