Raja Abhishek For NIRC 2024
25 days ago
ššš¦š§šš§ š”š²š šš²š¹šµš¶ š„šš¹š¶š»š“ š¼š» šš š²šŗš½šš¶š¼š» š³šæš¼šŗ š¦š²šæšš¶š°š² š§š®š š³š¼šæ šš§š š¦š²šæšš¶š°š²š š¢ š§šµš² š§šæš¶šÆšš»š®š¹ šµš²š¹š±: "As there was no allegation that the appellant failed to export goods, the conditions for availing the exemption were satisfied. However, penalty is upheld for failure to file returns on time."
š šš®š°šš: šš¼šŗš½š®š»š: HEG Limited šš°šš¶šš¶šš: The appellant, a manufacturer of graphite electrodes, claimed exemption under Notification No. 18/2009 and Notification No. 31/2012 for GTA services used in exports. ššššš²: Whether the appellant is entitled to exemption for GTA services despite procedural lapses?
āļø ššš±š“š²šŗš²š»š: The Tribunal ruled that exemption conditions were met as there were no allegations of export failure or missing documents. The demand for service tax and interest was set aside. However, a penalty under Section 77 for late filing of returns was upheld due to procedural lapses. The appeal was partly allowed.
šš®šš² šš»š³š¼šæšŗš®šš¶š¼š»: š§š¶šš¹š²: HEG Limited vs. Commissioner (Appeals) GST, Customs, and Central Excise, Bhopal š¦š²šæšš¶š°š² š§š®š šš½š½š²š®š¹ š”š¼. 51779 of 2017 š¢šæš±š²šæ šš®šš²: 08 May 2023 š This ruling affirms that substantial compliance with exemption conditions is sufficient, while penalties may apply for procedural lapses like delayed filings.
Page created with TweetHunter
Write your own