Raja Abhishek For NIRC 2024

@abhishekrajaram

about 2 months ago

โ€ขView on Twitter

๐—–๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—ง๐—”๐—ง ๐—ก๐—ฒ๐˜„ ๐——๐—ฒ๐—น๐—ต๐—ถ ๐—ฅ๐˜‚๐—น๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐——๐˜‚๐—ฝ๐—น๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฒ ๐—ง๐—ฎ๐˜… ๐——๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐Ÿ“ข ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ง๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ฏ๐˜‚๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—น๐—ฑ: "Once the service tax liability is discharged, regardless of whether by the service provider or recipient, a second payment cannot be demanded from the appellant."

๐Ÿ” ๐—™๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐˜๐˜€: ๐—–๐—ผ๐—บ๐—ฝ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜†: M/s. Aadarsh Sri Sai Manpower Solution (p) Ltd. ๐—œ๐˜€๐˜€๐˜‚๐—ฒ: Whether the appellant can be held liable to pay service tax again after it was partially paid by the service recipients. ๐—ฆ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜ƒ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฒ: Manpower recruitment or supply agency services.

โš–๏ธ ๐—๐˜‚๐—ฑ๐—ด๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜: The Tribunal, citing the Karnataka High Court decision in Zyeta Interiors Pvt. Ltd., held that once the tax liability is discharged by either the service provider or recipient, no further payment can be demanded. Since the full tax was already deposited in the governmentโ€™s account, the Tribunal set aside the additional tax demand and penalties on the directors.

๐—–๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐—œ๐—ป๐—ณ๐—ผ: ๐—ง๐—ถ๐˜๐—น๐—ฒ: M/s. Aadarsh Sri Sai Manpower Solution (p) Ltd. vs Commissioner, Customs, Central Excise & Service Tax ๐—ฆ๐—˜๐—ฅ๐—ฉ๐—œ๐—–๐—˜ ๐—ง๐—”๐—ซ ๐—”๐—ฃ๐—ฃ๐—˜๐—”๐—Ÿ ๐—ก๐—ข. 50610 OF 2017 ๐—ข๐—ฟ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐——๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฒ: 21 July 2023 ๐Ÿ“œ This decision confirms that full tax payment protects from duplicate demands, even when split between provider and recipient.

More from @abhishekrajaramReply on Twitter

Page created with TweetHunter

Write your own