
Raja Abhishek For NIRC 2024
over 1 year ago
ā¢View on š
ššš¦š§šš§ š”š²š šš²š¹šµš¶ š„šš¹š¶š»š“ š¼š» šš²šŗš®š»š± š³š¼šæ š¦š²šæšš¶š°š² š§š®š š¼š» ššæš²š¶š“šµš š¢ The Tribunal held:
"Once the return was filed, the responsibility lies with the Department to examine the returns in a timely manner. No evidence of suppression was shown; hence, the demand is set aside."
š šš®š°šš: šš¼šŗš½š®š»š: M/s Baba Super Minerals Private Limited āļø ššššš²: Whether the demand for service tax on freight paid for inward goods is proper? š£šæš¼š°š²š²š±š¶š»š“š: The adjudicating authority confirmed the demand, including penalties, against the appellant.
āļø ššš±š“š²šŗš²š»š: The Tribunal ruled that the reverse charge exemption applies only to transport from the Inland Container Depot to a port, not for goods received into a factory. As the Department failed to raise timely objections or show suppression of facts, the demand was barred by limitation, and the appeal was allowed.
šš®šš² šš»š³š¼šæšŗš®šš¶š¼š»: š§š¶šš¹š²: M/s Baba Super Minerals Private Limited vs. The Commissioner, Central Excise & CGST, Jaipur š¦š²šæšš¶š°š² š§š®š šš½š½š²š®š¹ š”š¼. 55308 of 2023 š¢šæš±š²šæ šš®šš²: 31 January 2024
š This ruling emphasizes that the responsibility to scrutinize returns lies with the Department, and without evidence of suppression, the demand cannot be upheld.
Page created with TweetHunter
Write your own