Raja Abhishek For NIRC 2024

@abhishekrajaram

over 1 year ago

•View on š•

š—–š—˜š—¦š—§š—”š—§ š—”š—²š˜„ š——š—²š—¹š—µš—¶ š—„š˜‚š—¹š—¶š—»š—“ š—¼š—» š——š—²š—ŗš—®š—»š—± š—³š—¼š—æ š—¦š—²š—æš˜ƒš—¶š—°š—² š—§š—®š˜… š—¼š—» š—™š—æš—²š—¶š—“š—µš˜ šŸ“¢ The Tribunal held:

"Once the return was filed, the responsibility lies with the Department to examine the returns in a timely manner. No evidence of suppression was shown; hence, the demand is set aside."

šŸ” š—™š—®š—°š˜š˜€: š—–š—¼š—ŗš—½š—®š—»š˜†: M/s Baba Super Minerals Private Limited āš–ļø š—œš˜€š˜€š˜‚š—²: Whether the demand for service tax on freight paid for inward goods is proper? š—£š—æš—¼š—°š—²š—²š—±š—¶š—»š—“š˜€: The adjudicating authority confirmed the demand, including penalties, against the appellant.

āš–ļø š—š˜‚š—±š—“š—²š—ŗš—²š—»š˜: The Tribunal ruled that the reverse charge exemption applies only to transport from the Inland Container Depot to a port, not for goods received into a factory. As the Department failed to raise timely objections or show suppression of facts, the demand was barred by limitation, and the appeal was allowed.

š—–š—®š˜€š—² š—œš—»š—³š—¼š—æš—ŗš—®š˜š—¶š—¼š—»: š—§š—¶š˜š—¹š—²: M/s Baba Super Minerals Private Limited vs. The Commissioner, Central Excise & CGST, Jaipur š—¦š—²š—æš˜ƒš—¶š—°š—² š—§š—®š˜… š—”š—½š—½š—²š—®š—¹ š—”š—¼. 55308 of 2023 š—¢š—æš—±š—²š—æ š——š—®š˜š—²: 31 January 2024

šŸ“œ This ruling emphasizes that the responsibility to scrutinize returns lies with the Department, and without evidence of suppression, the demand cannot be upheld.

More from @abhishekrajaramReply on š•

Page created with TweetHunter

Write your own