
Abhishek Raja "Ram"
12 months ago
ā¢View on X
ššš¦š§šš§ š”š²š šš²š¹šµš¶ š„šš¹š¶š»š“ š¼š» šš²š»šš®š ššæš²š±š¶š š³š¼šæ šš¼š»š®š¹ š¢š³š³š¶š°š²š š¢ š§šµš² š§šæš¶šÆšš»š®š¹ šµš²š¹š±: "Zonal Training Centre (ZTC) and Zonal Audit Office (ZAO) are integral parts of the appellant, and Cenvat credit cannot be denied solely because these offices are situated separately."
š šš®š°šš: šš¼šŗš½š®š»š: M/s Punjab National Bank ššššš²: Allegation of wrongful Cenvat credit availed on input services used at ZTC and ZAO, which were not providing taxable services. šš°šš¶šš¶šš: Credit availed under centralized registration; department disallowed credit, claiming ZO provided administrative support for offices with separate registrations.
āļø ššš±š“š²šŗš²š»š: The Tribunal ruled that ZTC, ZAO, and ZO are integral to the appellant's operations, assisting in taxable services under centralized control. Service tax was paid for taxable services provided by these offices. Rule 2(l) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, supports the classification of services received by these zonal offices as "input services." The denial of Cenvat credit solely due to separate locations is unjustified.
š šš®šš² šš»š³š¼šæšŗš®šš¶š¼š»: š§š¶šš¹š²: M/s Punjab National Bank vs. Commissioner, Central GST Division H š¢šæš±š²šæ šš®šš²: 12 January 2023 š This ruling reaffirms that integral zonal offices under centralized operations can claim Cenvat credit despite their physical separation.
Page created with TweetHunter
Write your own