Abhishek Raja "Ram"

@abhishekrajaram

12 months ago

•View on X

š—–š—˜š—¦š—§š—”š—§ š—”š—²š˜„ š——š—²š—¹š—µš—¶ š—„š˜‚š—¹š—¶š—»š—“ š—¼š—» š—–š—²š—»š˜ƒš—®š˜ š—–š—æš—²š—±š—¶š˜ š—³š—¼š—æ š—­š—¼š—»š—®š—¹ š—¢š—³š—³š—¶š—°š—²š˜€ šŸ“¢ š—§š—µš—² š—§š—æš—¶š—Æš˜‚š—»š—®š—¹ š—µš—²š—¹š—±: "Zonal Training Centre (ZTC) and Zonal Audit Office (ZAO) are integral parts of the appellant, and Cenvat credit cannot be denied solely because these offices are situated separately."

šŸ” š—™š—®š—°š˜š˜€: š—–š—¼š—ŗš—½š—®š—»š˜†: M/s Punjab National Bank š—œš˜€š˜€š˜‚š—²: Allegation of wrongful Cenvat credit availed on input services used at ZTC and ZAO, which were not providing taxable services. š—”š—°š˜š—¶š˜ƒš—¶š˜š˜†: Credit availed under centralized registration; department disallowed credit, claiming ZO provided administrative support for offices with separate registrations.

āš–ļø š—š˜‚š—±š—“š—²š—ŗš—²š—»š˜: The Tribunal ruled that ZTC, ZAO, and ZO are integral to the appellant's operations, assisting in taxable services under centralized control. Service tax was paid for taxable services provided by these offices. Rule 2(l) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, supports the classification of services received by these zonal offices as "input services." The denial of Cenvat credit solely due to separate locations is unjustified.

šŸ“œ š—–š—®š˜€š—² š—œš—»š—³š—¼š—æš—ŗš—®š˜š—¶š—¼š—»: š—§š—¶š˜š—¹š—²: M/s Punjab National Bank vs. Commissioner, Central GST Division H š—¢š—æš—±š—²š—æ š——š—®š˜š—²: 12 January 2023 šŸ“œ This ruling reaffirms that integral zonal offices under centralized operations can claim Cenvat credit despite their physical separation.

More from @abhishekrajaramReply on X

Page created with TweetHunter

Write your own