Abhishek Raja "Ram"

@abhishekrajaram

8 months ago

•View on X

š—–š—˜š—¦š—§š—”š—§ š—”š—²š˜„ š——š—²š—¹š—µš—¶ š—„š˜‚š—¹š—¶š—»š—“ š—¼š—» š—”š—±š˜ƒš—®š—»š—°š—²š˜€ š—®š—»š—± š—–š—˜š—”š—©š—”š—§ š—–š—æš—²š—±š—¶š˜ šŸ“¢ š—§š—µš—² š—§š—æš—¶š—Æš˜‚š—»š—®š—¹ š—µš—²š—¹š—±: "Advances adjusted with fees cannot be treated as security deposits and are liable to service tax. CENVAT credit on materials used for taxable services is rightly availed."

šŸ” š—™š—®š—°š˜š˜€: š—–š—¼š—ŗš—½š—®š—»š˜†: Applied Solar Technologies (India) Pvt. Ltd. š—œš˜€š˜€š˜‚š—²: Whether the appellant is liable for service tax on advances and irregular CENVAT credit availed. š—”š—°š˜š—¶š˜ƒš—¶š˜š˜†: Hybrid solar power provider faced a show-cause notice for unpaid service tax on advances and alleged irregular CENVAT credit claims.

āš–ļø š—š˜‚š—±š—“š—²š—ŗš—²š—»š˜: The Tribunal held that advances adjusted against future fees are taxable, while CENVAT credit on materials for taxable services was correctly availed. The appeal was partly allowed, upholding CENVAT credit eligibility and addressing the service tax liability on advances.

šŸ“œ š—–š—®š˜€š—² š—œš—»š—³š—¼š—æš—ŗš—®š˜š—¶š—¼š—»: š—§š—¶š˜š—¹š—²: Applied Solar Technologies (India) Pvt. Ltd. vs. Commissioner, CGST (Audit-II) š—¢š—æš—±š—²š—æ š——š—®š˜š—²: 20 January 2023 šŸ“œ This ruling clarifies the treatment of advances and eligibility of CENVAT credit for businesses.

More from @abhishekrajaramReply on X

Page created with TweetHunter

Write your own