Abhishek Raja "Ram"

@abhishekrajaram

8 months ago

•View on X

š—–š—²š˜€š˜š—®š˜ š—”š—²š˜„ š——š—²š—¹š—µš—¶ š—¢š—æš—±š—²š—æ: š—§š—¼š—¹š—¹ š—–š—µš—®š—æš—“š—² š—–š—¼š—¹š—¹š—²š—°š˜š—¶š—¼š—» š—³š—¼š—æ š—”š—›š—”š—œ š—”š—¼š˜ š—Ÿš—¶š—®š—Æš—¹š—² š˜š—¼ š—¦š—²š—æš˜ƒš—¶š—°š—² š—§š—®š˜… šŸ“¢ š—§š—µš—² š—§š—æš—¶š—Æš˜‚š—»š—®š—¹ š—µš—²š—¹š—±: "Toll collection on behalf of NHAI is not chargeable to Service Tax. Appeal allowed."

šŸ” š—™š—®š—°š˜š˜€: š—”š—½š—½š—²š—¹š—¹š—®š—»š˜: M/s. Sangam India Limited š—œš˜€š˜€š˜‚š—²: Toll/user fee collection by private entities for NHAI under contract is not subject to Service Tax, as the contractor bears operational risks and is not a "commission agent."

āš–ļø š—š˜‚š—±š—“š—²š—ŗš—²š—»š˜: The Tribunal ruled toll collection by the appellant was independent, with operational risks borne by them, not as a commission agent. It relied on precedent invalidating Circular No. 152/3/2012-ST and clarified Section 66D exempts such services without provider-based restrictions. Hence, no Service Tax liability arose.

šŸ“œ š—–š—®š˜€š—² š—œš—»š—³š—¼š—æš—ŗš—®š˜š—¶š—¼š—»: š—§š—¶š˜š—¹š—²: M/s. Sangam India Limited Vs Commissioner of Central Excise š—¢š—æš—±š—²š—æ š——š—®š˜š—²: 21 February 2023 šŸ“œ Toll collection under NHAI contracts is not taxable, as contractors independently operate and bear associated risks, not acting as agents..

More from @abhishekrajaramReply on X

Page created with TweetHunter

Write your own