Abhishek Raja "Ram"

@abhishekrajaram

5 days ago

ā€¢View on Twitter

š—–š—˜š—¦š—§š—”š—§ š— š˜‚š—ŗš—Æš—®š—¶ š—„š˜‚š—¹š—¶š—»š—“ š—¼š—» š—„š—²š—³š˜‚š—»š—± š—¼š—³ š—–š—˜š—”š—©š—”š—§ š—–š—暝—²š—±š—¶š˜ š—³š—¼š—æ š—˜š˜…š—½š—¼š—暝˜ š—¦š—²š—暝˜ƒš—¶š—°š—²š˜€ šŸ“¢ š—§š—µš—² š—§š—暝—¶š—Æš˜‚š—»š—®š—¹ š—µš—²š—¹š—±: "The appellant is eligible for the refund of unutilized CENVAT credit on export of services, as the credit was not disallowed through a Show Cause Notice (SCN)."

šŸ” š—™š—®š—°š˜š˜€: š—–š—¼š—ŗš—½š—®š—»š˜†: M/s Saavn Media Private Limited š—œš˜€š˜€š˜‚š—²: Whether the appellant is eligible for the refund of unutilized CENVAT credit? š—”š—°š˜š—¶š˜ƒš—¶š˜š˜†: The appellant, engaged in exporting services, availed CENVAT credit on input services and filed a refund application for the unutilized credit under Notification No. 27/2012-CE. The refund was partially denied, leading to an appeal.

āš–ļø š—š˜‚š—±š—“š—²š—ŗš—²š—»š˜: The Tribunal ruled that since the CENVAT credit was not disallowed through a Show Cause Notice under Rule 14, the unutilized credit remained valid in the appellant's books. Consequently, the refund of the credit could not be denied. The appeal was allowed, and the refund rejection was set aside.

šŸ“œ š—–š—®š˜€š—² š—œš—»š—³š—¼š—暝—ŗš—®š˜š—¶š—¼š—»: š—§š—¶š˜š—¹š—²: M/s Saavn Media Private Limited vs. Commissioner of Central Goods & Service Tax, Mumbai East š—¢š—暝—±š—²š—æ š——š—®š˜š—²: 16 March 2023 šŸ“œ This ruling emphasizes that CENVAT credit accumulated on export services cannot be denied unless specifically disallowed through a formal Show Cause Notice under Rule 14.

More from @abhishekrajaramReply on Twitter

Page created with TweetHunter

Write your own