Abhishek Raja "Ram"

@abhishekrajaram

2 days ago

ā€¢View on Twitter

š—–š—²š˜€š˜š—®š˜ š— š˜‚š—ŗš—Æš—®š—¶ š—„š˜‚š—¹š—¶š—»š—“ š—¼š—» š—„š—²š—³š˜‚š—»š—± š—–š—¹š—®š—¶š—ŗš˜€ š—³š—¼š—æ š—¦š—˜š—­ š—Øš—»š—¶š˜š˜€ šŸ“¢ š—§š—µš—² š—§š—暝—¶š—Æš˜‚š—»š—®š—¹ š—µš—²š—¹š—±: "Refund claims cannot be denied without issuing notice under Rule 14 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. Attested photocopies of invoices can be accepted as proof of payment of duty. Appeal partly allowed."

šŸ” š—™š—®š—°š˜š˜€: š—”š—½š—½š—²š—¹š—¹š—®š—»š˜: M/s. WNS Global Services Pvt. Ltd. š—œš˜€š˜€š˜‚š—²: Refund claims for SEZ unit's input service tax credits were rejected due to missing invoices and disputed nexus with exported services.

āš–ļø š—š˜‚š—±š—“š—²š—ŗš—²š—»š˜: The Tribunal held that refund claims cannot be denied under Rule 5 without issuing notice under Rule 14. Attested copies of invoices are valid if originals are with the department. For claims rejected due to nexus or address mismatches, the matter was remanded for re-examination.

šŸ“œ š—–š—®š˜€š—² š—œš—»š—³š—¼š—暝—ŗš—®š˜š—¶š—¼š—»: š—§š—¶š˜š—¹š—²: M/s. WNS Global Services Pvt. Ltd. vs. Commissioner of CGST, Navi Mumbai š—¢š—暝—±š—²š—æ š——š—®š˜š—²: 28 February 2023 šŸ“œ This ruling reinforces the procedural safeguards in refund claims under Rule 5 and the admissibility of attested documents in cases where originals are unavailable.

More from @abhishekrajaramReply on Twitter

Page created with TweetHunter

Write your own