Abhishek Raja "Ram"
8 months ago
ā¢View on X
ššš¦š§šš§ š ššŗšÆš®š¶ š„šš¹š¶š»š“ š¼š» š„š²š³šš»š± šš¹š®š¶šŗ š³š¼šæ šŖš¼šæšøš šš¼š»ššæš®š°š š¦š²šæšš¶š°š²š š¢ š§šµš² š§šæš¶šÆšš»š®š¹ šµš²š¹š±: "Refund claim for Works Contract Services provided to Government buildings is admissible, as no unjust enrichment occurred."
š šš®š°šš: šš¼šŗš½š®š»š: Appellant providing Works Contract Services for Central and State Government buildings. šš°šš¶šš¶šš: Filed a refund claim for service tax paid on these services. ššššš²: Whether the refund claim is admissible, considering unjust enrichment?
āļø ššš±š“šŗš²š»š: The Tribunal ruled that since the appellant did not anticipate any service tax burden while submitting bids and contracts excluded additional payments for service tax, the unjust enrichment clause does not apply. The refund claim was therefore allowed.
š šš®šš² šš»š³š¼šæšŗš®šš¶š¼š»: š§š¶šš¹š²: Appellant vs. Commissioner of Central Goods & Service Tax š¢šæš±š²šæ šš®šš²: 21 December 2024
Page created with TweetHunter
Write your own