Abhishek Raja "Ram"

@abhishekrajaram

8 months ago

โ€ขView on X

๐—–๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—ง๐—”๐—ง ๐— ๐˜‚๐—บ๐—ฏ๐—ฎ๐—ถ ๐—ฅ๐˜‚๐—น๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ฅ๐—ฒ๐—ณ๐˜‚๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐—•๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ณ๐—ถ๐˜ ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐—˜๐˜…๐—ฝ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐˜ ๐—ฆ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜ƒ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฒ๐˜€ ๐Ÿ“ข ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ง๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ฏ๐˜‚๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—น๐—ฑ: "The refund benefit cannot be denied on the ground that there is no nexus between the input services and the exportation of output service under Rule 5 of the CENVAT Credit Rules."

๐Ÿ” ๐—™๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐˜๐˜€: ๐—–๐—ผ๐—บ๐—ฝ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜†: M/s Coface India Credit Management Services Pvt. Ltd. ๐—œ๐˜€๐˜€๐˜‚๐—ฒ: Whether the appellant is eligible for a refund despite the Departmentโ€™s objections regarding input service nexus and opening balance considerations. ๐—”๐—ฐ๐˜๐—ถ๐˜ƒ๐—ถ๐˜๐˜†: Filed a refund application under Rule 5 of CENVAT Credit Rules, which was rejected citing no nexus and exclusion of opening balance.

โš–๏ธ ๐—๐˜‚๐—ฑ๐—ด๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜: The Tribunal cited CBE&C Circular No. 120/01/2010 and previous judgments like Ness Technologies (I) Pvt. Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Service Tax Division-V, Mumbai. It ruled that refund claims cannot be denied on the grounds of no nexus between input and output services or opening balance exclusions. The appeal was allowed, setting aside objections.

๐Ÿ“œ ๐—–๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐—œ๐—ป๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป: ๐—ง๐—ถ๐˜๐—น๐—ฒ: M/s Coface India Credit Management Services Pvt. Ltd. vs. Commissioner of CGST & C. Ex., Belapur ๐—ข๐—ฟ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐——๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฒ: 10 January 2023 ๐Ÿ“œ This ruling ensures exporters are entitled to refunds under Rule 5 despite departmental objections regarding input-output service nexus.

More from @abhishekrajaramReply on X

Page created with TweetHunter

Write your own