Raja Abhishek For NIRC 2024

@abhishekrajaram

about 2 months ago

ā€¢View on Twitter

š—–š—˜š—¦š—§š—”š—§ š— š˜‚š—ŗš—Æš—®š—¶ š—„š˜‚š—¹š—¶š—»š—“ š—¼š—» š—£š—²š—»š—®š—¹ š—œš—»š˜š—²š—暝—²š˜€š˜ š—®š—»š—± š—•š—¼š˜‚š—»š—°š—² š—–š—µš—®š—暝—“š—²š˜€ š—³š—¼š—æ š—”š—•š—™š—–š˜€ šŸ“¢ š—§š—µš—² š—§š—暝—¶š—Æš˜‚š—»š—®š—¹ š—暝˜‚š—¹š—²š—±: "Penal interest and bounce charges collected are not 'consideration' for the service of 'tolerating an act' and are therefore not subject to service tax."

šŸ” š—™š—®š—°š˜š˜€: Company: M/s Bajaj Finance Ltd. š—œš˜€š˜€š˜‚š—²: Are penal interest and bounce charges liable for service tax as consideration for tolerating delays and dishonored payments?

šŸ“ š—š˜‚š—±š—“š—ŗš—²š—»š˜: The Tribunal ruled that penal interest and bounce charges collected by NBFCs are regulated by RBI guidelines and are not "consideration" for services under "tolerating an act." Citing CBIC and prior Tribunal rulings, it held that these charges are exempt from service tax as they do not constitute a taxable service.

šŸ“œ š—–š—®š˜€š—² š—œš—»š—³š—¼š—暝—ŗš—®š˜š—¶š—¼š—»: š—§š—¶š˜š—¹š—²: M/s Bajaj Finance Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Central Excise & GST, Pune-I š—¦š—²š—暝˜ƒš—¶š—°š—² š—§š—®š˜… š—”š—½š—½š—²š—®š—¹ š—”š—¼. 90043 of 2018 š—¢š—暝—±š—²š—æ š——š—®š˜š—²: 07 August 2023 šŸ“œ This ruling affirms that penal interest and bounce charges do not constitute taxable services and reinforces the exclusion of such charges from service tax liability under the Finance Act, 1994.

More from @abhishekrajaramReply on Twitter

Page created with TweetHunter

Write your own