Abhishek Raja "Ram"
3 days ago
šš²ššš®š š ššŗšÆš®š¶ š„šš¹š¶š»š“ š¼š» šš²š»šš®š ššæš²š±š¶š š®š»š± š„š²š³šš»š± šš¹š®š¶šŗš š¢ š§šµš² š§šæš¶šÆšš»š®š¹ šµš²š¹š±: "The correctness of availment of Cenvat Credit at the stage of filing of refund claim cannot be questioned, since the statute deals with the situation differently. Refund granted. Appeal allowed."
š šš®š°šš: šš½š½š²š¹š¹š®š»š: Deloitte Global Financial Advisory India Pvt Ltd ššššš²: Refund claim for April-June 2016 under Rule 5 of CENVAT Credit Rules partially disallowed; disputed services deemed ineligible for credit.
āļø ššš±š“š²šŗš²š»š: The Tribunal ruled that Rule 5 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, ensures tax neutrality in exports, and the correctness of Cenvat credit availment cannot be questioned during refund claims. Following precedent, the refund was granted, and the appeal allowed.
š šš®šš² šš»š³š¼šæšŗš®šš¶š¼š»: š§š¶šš¹š²: Deloitte Global Financial Advisory India Pvt Ltd vs. Commissioner of Service Tax - III š¢šæš±š²šæ šš®šš²: 3 March 2023 š This ruling affirms that refund claims cannot be denied by questioning the correctness of Cenvat credit availment at the refund stage.
Page created with TweetHunter
Write your own