Raja Abhishek For NIRC 2024
3 months ago
๐๐๐ฆ๐ง๐๐ง ๐๐ผ๐น๐ธ๐ฎ๐๐ฎ ๐ฅ๐๐น๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐ผ๐ป ๐ฆ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฒ ๐ง๐ฎ๐ ๐ผ๐ป ๐๐ป๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ป๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป๐ฎ๐น ๐ฅ๐ผ๐ฎ๐บ๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐ฆ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฒ๐ ๐ข The Tribunal held: "Payment of roaming charges to foreign telecom operators (FTOs) for providing connectivity services to the appellant's subscribers abroad is not subject to service tax under 'Business Auxiliary Services' as FTOs do not qualify as 'Telegraph Authority.'"
๐ ๐๐ฎ๐ฐ๐๐: ๐๐ผ๐บ๐ฝ๐ฎ๐ป๐: M/s Vodafone Essar East Ltd. ๐๐๐๐๐ฒ: Whether the international roaming services are liable to service tax under "Business Auxiliary Services"?
๐๐ฐ๐๐ถ๐๐ถ๐๐: The appellant entered into international roaming agreements with foreign telecom operators (FTOs) to provide roaming services to subscribers traveling abroad. A show-cause notice was issued alleging service tax liability on roaming services under the reverse charge mechanism, categorizing them as โBusiness Auxiliary Services.โ
โ๏ธ ๐๐๐ฑ๐ด๐ฒ๐บ๐ฒ๐ป๐: The Tribunal ruled that services provided by foreign telecom operators (FTOs) fall under 'Telecommunication Service' and are not taxable as FTOs do not qualify as 'Telegraph Authority' under the India Telegraph Act. The demand under 'Business Auxiliary Services' is unsustainable, and the appeal was allowed, setting aside the service tax demand.
๐๐ฎ๐๐ฒ ๐๐ป๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ๐บ๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป: ๐ง๐ถ๐๐น๐ฒ: M/s Vodafone Essar East Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Service Tax, Kolkata ๐ฆ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฒ ๐ง๐ฎ๐ ๐๐ฝ๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐น ๐ก๐ผ. 70946 of 2013 ๐ข๐ฟ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐๐ฎ๐๐ฒ: 30 November 2023 ๐ This ruling confirms that roaming charges paid to FTOs for services rendered outside India are not taxable under 'Business Auxiliary Services.'
Page created with TweetHunter
Write your own