Abhishek Raja "Ram"
8 months ago
ā¢View on X
šš²ššš®š šš¼š¹šøš®šš® š„šš¹š¶š»š“ š¼š» š„š²š³šš»š± š¦š°šµš²šŗš² š³š¼šæ š¦š²šæšš¶š°š² š§š®š š½š®š¶š± š¼š» ššøš½š¼šæš š¦š²šæšš¶š°š²š š¢ š§šµš² š§šæš¶šÆšš»š®š¹ šµš²š¹š±: "No need for one-to-one co-relation of services to export goods for refund claims. Appeal allowed."
š šš®š°šš: šš½š½š²š¹š¹š®š»š: M/s. S.K.Sarawagi Company Private Limited ššššš²: The appellant sought a refund on service tax for export-related services, but the refund was denied due to the lack of one-to-one co-relation between services and export transactions under Notification No. 41/2007-ST.
āļø ššš±š“š²šŗš²š»š: The Tribunal ruled that refunds could be granted based on a broader correlation between services and exports, as seen in previous cases like Jumbo Mining Ltd. v. CCE Hyderabad. It noted that Notification No. 17/2009-S.T. simplified the process by allowing self-certification or CA certification, leading to the appeal's success.
š šš®šš² šš»š³š¼šæšŗš®šš¶š¼š»: š§š¶šš¹š²: M/s. S.K.Sarawagi Company Private Limited vs. Commissioner of CGST & CX, Kolkata South Commissionerate š¢šæš±š²šæ šš®šš²: 8 February 2023 š This ruling clarifies that strict co-relation between services and exports is not required for refund claims under the simplified refund scheme.
Page created with TweetHunter
Write your own