Abhishek Raja "Ram"
8 months ago
ā¢View on X
ššš¦š§šš§ šš¼š¹šøš®šš® š„šš¹š¶š»š“ š¼š» š„š²š³šš»š± šš®šš²š± š¼š» šš²šÆš¶š š”š¼šš²š š¢ š§šµš² š§šæš¶šÆšš»š®š¹ šµš²š¹š±: "If documents provide necessary particulars under Rule 4A, refunds cannot be denied merely because they are debit notes and not invoices."
š šš®š°šš: šš¼šŗš½š®š»š: M/s Pragati Agri Products Pvt. Ltd. ššššš²: Whether the refund is inadmissible because M/s Marine Container Services (India) Pvt. Ltd. issued debit notes instead of invoices. šš°šš¶šš¶šš: Filed a refund claim that was denied citing improper documentation under Notification No. 41/2012-ST.
āļø ššš±š“š²šŗš²š»š: The Tribunal noted that the debit notes contained all necessary details required under Rule 4A of the Service Tax Rules, 1994. It relied on the precedent set in SRF Ltd., which established that refunds cannot be denied solely because the documents are not invoices. As the conditions under Notification No. 41/2012-ST were fulfilled, the denial of the refund was deemed unsustainable.
š šš®šš² šš»š³š¼šæšŗš®šš¶š¼š»: š§š¶šš¹š²: M/s Pragati Agri Products Pvt. Ltd. vs. Commissioner of CGST & CX, Kolkata North Commissionerate š¢šæš±š²šæ šš®šš²: 12 January 2023 š This ruling reinforces that valid debit notes containing requisite details are admissible for claiming refunds under the Service Tax Rules.
Page created with TweetHunter
Write your own