Raja Abhishek For NIRC 2024

@abhishekrajaram

about 1 month ago

โ€ขView on Twitter

๐—–๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—ง๐—”๐—ง ๐—ž๐—ผ๐—น๐—ธ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฎ ๐—ฅ๐˜‚๐—น๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ฃ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ-๐——๐—ฒ๐—ฝ๐—ผ๐˜€๐—ถ๐˜ ๐˜‚๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐——๐—ฅ๐—–-๐Ÿฌ๐Ÿฏ ๐Ÿ“ข ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ต ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐—–๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—ง๐—”๐—ง ๐—ž๐—ผ๐—น๐—ธ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฎ ๐˜€๐˜๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฑ: The appellantโ€™s DRC-03 deposit under Section 35 of the Central Excise Act, 1944, is invalid for appeal filing.

๐Ÿ” ๐—™๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐˜๐˜€: ๐—–๐—ผ๐—บ๐—ฝ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜†: M/s Jetha Ram Mali ๐—œ๐˜€๐˜€๐˜‚๐—ฒ: Whether the pre-deposit made through DRC-03 is permissible under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944?

๐—ฃ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—ฐ๐—ฒ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด๐˜€: The appellant deposited Rs. 84,590/- as a pre-deposit through DRC-03 on 12.04.2023 for filing an appeal. The Commissioner (Appeals) dismissed the appeal due to non-compliance with the mandatory pre-deposit requirement without examining the case's merits.

โš–๏ธ ๐—๐˜‚๐—ฑ๐—ด๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜: The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that payments via DRC-03 are not allowed under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944, citing the CBIC Circular dated 28.10.2022 on pre-deposit payment methods.

๐—–๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐—œ๐—ป๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป: ๐—ฃ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐˜€: M/s Jetha Ram Mali vs. Commissioner of Central Goods, Service Tax and Central Excise ๐—ข๐—ฟ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐——๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฒ: 06 June 2024

๐Ÿ“œ This ruling confirms that the appellant's deposit through DRC-03 does not fulfill the mandatory pre-deposit requirement for filing an appeal under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. #CESTAT #PreDeposit #arr4nirc

More from @abhishekrajaramReply on Twitter

Page created with TweetHunter

Write your own