Abhishek Raja "Ram"
5 days ago
ššš¦š§šš§ šš¼š¹šøš®šš® š„šš¹š¶š»š“ š¼š» š£š²š»š®š¹šš š³š¼šæ šš²š¹š®šš²š± š£š®ššŗš²š»š š¼š³ š¦š²šæšš¶š°š² š§š®š š¢ š§šµš² š§šæš¶šÆšš»š®š¹ šµš²š¹š±: "Since the appellant made the delayed payment of service tax before the issuance of the show-cause notice, no penalty is justifiable."
š šš®š°šš: šš¼šŗš½š®š»š: M/s Kanoi Textile Agency ššššš²: Whether the penalty imposed under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 is justified? šš°šš¶šš¶šš: The appellant delayed payment of service tax on TDS but paid the amount before the issuance of the show-cause notice. The impugned order dropped reimbursement expenses but imposed a penalty under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994.
āļø ššš±š“š²šŗš²š»š: The Tribunal ruled that since the appellant paid the service tax before the show-cause notice was issued, no penalty under Section 78 was warranted. The payment was made promptly, and the penalty was therefore dropped. The appeal was allowed, and the penalty was set aside.
š šš®šš² šš»š³š¼šæšŗš®šš¶š¼š»: š§š¶šš¹š²: M/s Kanoi Textile Agency vs. Commissioner of CGST & Excise, Ranchi š¢šæš±š²šæ šš®šš²: 23 March 2023 š This ruling clarifies that if the service tax is paid before the show-cause notice, no penalty can be imposed.
Page created with TweetHunter
Write your own