Abhishek Raja "Ram"

@abhishekrajaram

8 months ago

โ€ขView on X

๐—–๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜๐—ฎ๐˜ ๐—›๐˜†๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ฏ๐—ฎ๐—ฑ ๐—ฅ๐˜‚๐—น๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ง๐—ฎ๐˜…๐—ฎ๐—ฏ๐—น๐—ฒ ๐—–๐—ผ๐—บ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฐ๐—ถ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐—ต๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ฆ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜ƒ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฒ๐˜€ ๐Ÿ“ข ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ง๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ฏ๐˜‚๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—น๐—ฑ: "Imparting coaching for competitive examinations like IIT/JEE and AIEEE is a taxable service. The demand for service tax is valid. Revenue appeal allowed."

๐Ÿ” ๐—™๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐˜๐˜€: ๐—ฅ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐—ฝ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜: Vikas Educational Institutions Ltd. (VEIL) ๐—œ๐˜€๐˜€๐˜‚๐—ฒ: VEIL was held liable for service tax on fees collected for coaching services (2003โ€“2005). A show-cause notice demanded tax, interest, and penalties for services disguised as tuition fees.

โš–๏ธ ๐—๐˜‚๐—ฑ๐—ด๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜: VEIL was deemed to provide taxable commercial coaching services, collecting fees without sufficient evidence to refute documented receipts. Treated as interdependent with VES, VEIL was identified as the service provider. The Tribunal overturned the Commissionerโ€™s decision, upholding the service tax demand with penalties.

๐Ÿ“œ ๐—–๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐—œ๐—ป๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป: ๐—ง๐—ถ๐˜๐—น๐—ฒ: The Commissioner of Customs & Central Excise vs. Vikas Educational Institutions Ltd. ๐—ข๐—ฟ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐——๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฒ: 1 February 2023 ๐Ÿ“œ This ruling confirms that coaching for competitive examinations falls under taxable commercial coaching services.

More from @abhishekrajaramReply on X

Page created with TweetHunter

Write your own