Raja Abhishek For NIRC 2024

@abhishekrajaram

24 days ago

ā€¢View on Twitter

š—–š—˜š—¦š—§š—”š—§ š—›š˜†š—±š—²š—暝—®š—Æš—®š—± š—„š˜‚š—¹š—¶š—»š—“ š—¼š—» š—¦š—²š—暝˜ƒš—¶š—°š—² š—§š—®š˜… š—¼š—» š—Ŗš—¼š—暝—øš˜€ š—–š—¼š—»š˜š—暝—®š—°š˜ š—³š—¼š—æ š—šš—¼š˜ƒš—²š—暝—»š—ŗš—²š—»š˜ š—£š—暝—¼š—·š—²š—°š˜š˜€ šŸ“¢ š—§š—µš—² š—§š—暝—¶š—Æš˜‚š—»š—®š—¹ š—µš—²š—¹š—±: "Works contracts for Government projects such as water pipelines and canals, executed as turnkey/EPC projects, are not subject to service tax under Section 65(105)(zzzza)."

šŸ” š—™š—®š—°š˜š˜€: š—–š—¼š—ŗš—½š—®š—»š˜†: Progressive Constructions Ltd. š—œš˜€š˜€š˜‚š—²: Whether the appellant is liable to pay service tax for works contracts undertaken for Government projects. š—”š—°š˜š—¶š˜ƒš—¶š˜š˜†: The appellant provided works contract services for Government projects like canals, water pipelines, road works, and earthwork. A show-cause notice demanded service tax for the period 2007ā€“2011.

āš–ļø š—š˜‚š—±š—“š—²š—ŗš—²š—»š˜: The Tribunal ruled that works contracts for the Government of Andhra Pradesh are not taxable under Section 65(105) (zzzza), as they are non-commercial. Relying on precedents like Lanco Infratech Ltd., the demand, interest, and penalties for 12 projects were set aside. The appeal was allowed, and demands were remanded.

šŸ“œ š—–š—®š˜€š—² š—œš—»š—³š—¼š—暝—ŗš—®š˜š—¶š—¼š—»: š—§š—¶š˜š—¹š—²: Progressive Constructions Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Service Tax, Hyderabad ā€“ Service Tax š—¦š—²š—暝˜ƒš—¶š—°š—² š—§š—®š˜… š—”š—½š—½š—²š—®š—¹ š—”š—¼. 21200 of 2014 š—¢š—暝—±š—²š—æ š——š—®š˜š—²: 25 April 2023 šŸ“œ This ruling affirms that works contracts for Government projects, particularly involving essential utilities, are exempt from service tax.

More from @abhishekrajaramReply on Twitter

Page created with TweetHunter

Write your own