Raja Abhishek For NIRC 2024
about 1 month ago
ššš¦š§šš§ šš²š¹šµš¶ š„šš¹š¶š»š“ š¼š» š¦š²šæšš¶š°š² š§š®š šš¶š®šÆš¶š¹š¶šš š¼š» š„š²š®š±š š š¶š šš¼š»š°šæš²šš² š¢ The bench of CESTAT Delhi stated:
Without identifying a specific service, the Department can't assume service occurred and tax is owed.
š šš®š°šš: šš¼šŗš½š®š»š: M/s Shreejee RMC Private Limited ššššš²: Whether service tax can be levied on the supply of ready mix concrete.
š£šæš¼š°š²š²š±š¶š»š“š: The Appellant, a Ready Mix Concrete supplier, received a show cause notice on 21.04.2022 for service tax, which was confirmed. The Department's failure to specify the service or consideration led to the Appellant challenging the demand.
āļø ššš±š“šŗš²š»š: Tribunal ruled Department's service tax assumption on ready mix concrete unsustainable, favoring Shreejee RMC based on prior cases.
šš®šš² šš»š³š¼šæšŗš®šš¶š¼š»: š£š®šæšš¶š²š: M/s Shreejee RMC Private Limited Vs Commissioner of C.G.S.T. & C.E., Rohtak š¢šæš±š²šæ šš®šš²: 14 May 2024
š This ruling affirms that simply supplying ready-mix concrete does not qualify as a taxable service under service tax laws, unless distinct services and associated compensation are clearly identified. #CESTAT #ServiceTax #arr4nirc
Page created with TweetHunter
Write your own