Raja Abhishek For NIRC 2024

@abhishekrajaram

about 1 month ago

ā€¢View on Twitter

š—–š—˜š—¦š—§š—”š—§ š——š—²š—¹š—µš—¶ š—„š˜‚š—¹š—¶š—»š—“ š—¼š—» š—¦š—²š—暝˜ƒš—¶š—°š—² š—§š—®š˜… š—Ÿš—¶š—®š—Æš—¶š—¹š—¶š˜š˜† š—¼š—» š—„š—²š—®š—±š˜† š— š—¶š˜… š—–š—¼š—»š—°š—暝—²š˜š—² šŸ“¢ The bench of CESTAT Delhi stated:

Without identifying a specific service, the Department can't assume service occurred and tax is owed.

šŸ” š—™š—®š—°š˜š˜€: š—–š—¼š—ŗš—½š—®š—»š˜†: M/s Shreejee RMC Private Limited š—œš˜€š˜€š˜‚š—²: Whether service tax can be levied on the supply of ready mix concrete.

š—£š—暝—¼š—°š—²š—²š—±š—¶š—»š—“š˜€: The Appellant, a Ready Mix Concrete supplier, received a show cause notice on 21.04.2022 for service tax, which was confirmed. The Department's failure to specify the service or consideration led to the Appellant challenging the demand.

āš–ļø š—š˜‚š—±š—“š—ŗš—²š—»š˜: Tribunal ruled Department's service tax assumption on ready mix concrete unsustainable, favoring Shreejee RMC based on prior cases.

š—–š—®š˜€š—² š—œš—»š—³š—¼š—暝—ŗš—®š˜š—¶š—¼š—»: š—£š—®š—暝˜š—¶š—²š˜€: M/s Shreejee RMC Private Limited Vs Commissioner of C.G.S.T. & C.E., Rohtak š—¢š—暝—±š—²š—æ š——š—®š˜š—²: 14 May 2024

šŸ“œ This ruling affirms that simply supplying ready-mix concrete does not qualify as a taxable service under service tax laws, unless distinct services and associated compensation are clearly identified. #CESTAT #ServiceTax #arr4nirc

More from @abhishekrajaramReply on Twitter

Page created with TweetHunter

Write your own