Raja Abhishek For NIRC 2024

@abhishekrajaram

about 2 months ago

ā€¢View on Twitter

š—–š—˜š—¦š—§š—”š—§ š——š—²š—¹š—µš—¶ š—„š˜‚š—¹š—¶š—»š—“ š—¼š—» š—¦š—²š—暝˜ƒš—¶š—°š—² š—§š—®š˜… š—Ÿš—¶š—®š—Æš—¶š—¹š—¶š˜š˜† š—³š—¼š—æ š—”š˜ƒš—¶š—®š˜š—¶š—¼š—» š—œš—»š—°š—¼š—ŗš—² šŸ“¢ The bench of CESTAT Delhi stated, "It becomes crystal clear that the present is not at all a case of tax evasion."

šŸ” š—™š—®š—°š˜š˜€: š—–š—¼š—ŗš—½š—®š—»š˜†: M/s. Jindal Steel & Power Ltd. (JSPL) š—œš˜€š˜€š˜‚š—²:JSPL was scrutinized for not paying service tax on aviation income. A Show Cause Notice was issued, and the service tax, interest, and penalty were confirmed.

āš–ļø š—š˜‚š—±š—“š—ŗš—²š—»š˜: The Tribunal ruled that income from dry leasing aircraft isn't subject to service tax. The Raipur Commissionerate lacked jurisdiction over JSPL's Delhi unit, and the demand was unsustainable. The appeal was allowed on May 3, 2024.

š—–š—®š˜€š—² š—œš—»š—³š—¼š—暝—ŗš—®š˜š—¶š—¼š—»: š—§š—¶š˜š—¹š—²: M/s. Jindal Steel & Power Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Central Excise and Service Tax, Raipur š—–š—®š˜€š—² š—”š—¼.: SERVICE TAX Appeal No. 10234 of 2017 š—¢š—暝—±š—²š—æ š——š—®š˜š—²: 03 May 2024

šŸ“œ This ruling clarifies that the bifurcation of aviation income is crucial in determining the service tax liability, and jurisdiction plays a significant role in issuing Show Cause Notices. #CESTAT #ServiceTax #LegalUpdate #arr4nirc

More from @abhishekrajaramReply on Twitter

Page created with TweetHunter

Write your own