Raja Abhishek For NIRC 2024
2 months ago
ššš¦š§šš§ šš²š¹šµš¶ š„šš¹š¶š»š“ š¼š» š£šæš²-šš²š½š¼šš¶š šš¶š® šš„š-š¬šÆ š¢ The bench of CESTAT Delhi stated Payment made through DRC-03 is not permissible under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944, for the purpose of pre-deposit.
š šš®š°šš: š£š®šæšš¶š²š: M/s Jetha Ram Mali vs. Commissioner of Central Goods, Service Tax, and Central Excise ššššš²: Whether pre-deposit made through DRC-03 is permissible under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944?
š£šæš¼š°š²š²š±š¶š»š“š: M/s Jetha Ram Mali deposited Rs. 84,590/- as a pre-deposit for an appeal through DRC-03 on 12.04.2023. The Commissioner (Appeals) dismissed the appeal due to non-compliance with the mandatory pre-deposit requirement.
āļø ššš±š“šŗš²š»š: The Tribunal referenced previous rulings and the CBIC Circular dated 28.10.2022, clarifying that pre-deposit via DRC-03 is not permissible. The appeal was dismissed on June 6, 2024.
š This ruling confirms that pre-deposits made via DRC-03 are not permissible under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. #CESTAT #CentralExcise #arr4nirc
Page created with TweetHunter
Write your own