Raja Abhishek For NIRC 2024
about 1 month ago
ššš¦š§šš§ šš²š¹šµš¶ š„šš¹š¶š»š“ š¼š» šš š½š¼šæš š¼š³ š¦š²šæšš¶š°š²š š¢ The bench of CESTAT Delhi stated: Services provided by M/s Viavi Solutions India Pvt. Ltd. qualify as export of services, not intermediary services. The appeal is allowed.
š šš®š°šš: šš¼šŗš½š®š»š: M/s Viavi Solutions India Pvt. Ltd. ššššš²: Whether services provided are exports or intermediary services.
š£šæš¼š°š²š²š±š¶š»š“š: The company received commissions from JDSU USA and did not charge Service Tax, believing the services were exports. A refund application for the mistakenly deposited tax was rejected.
āļø ššš±š“šŗš²š»š: The services qualify as exports under Rule 6A of the Service Tax Rules. The amended definition of "Intermediary" does not apply as the dispute was for the period before the amendment. Case Info:
š¢šæš±š²šæ šš®šš²: 03 June 2024 š This ruling confirms that the services provided by the appellant are considered exports and are exempt from Service Tax. #CESTAT #ServiceTax #arr4nirc
Page created with TweetHunter
Write your own