Raja Abhishek For NIRC 2024

@abhishekrajaram

about 1 month ago

ā€¢View on Twitter

š—–š—˜š—¦š—§š—”š—§ š——š—²š—¹š—µš—¶ š—„š˜‚š—¹š—¶š—»š—“ š—¼š—» š—˜š˜…š—½š—¼š—暝˜ š—¼š—³ š—¦š—²š—暝˜ƒš—¶š—°š—²š˜€ šŸ“¢ The bench of CESTAT Delhi stated: Services provided by M/s Viavi Solutions India Pvt. Ltd. qualify as export of services, not intermediary services. The appeal is allowed.

šŸ” š—™š—®š—°š˜š˜€: š—–š—¼š—ŗš—½š—®š—»š˜†: M/s Viavi Solutions India Pvt. Ltd. š—œš˜€š˜€š˜‚š—²: Whether services provided are exports or intermediary services.

š—£š—暝—¼š—°š—²š—²š—±š—¶š—»š—“š˜€: The company received commissions from JDSU USA and did not charge Service Tax, believing the services were exports. A refund application for the mistakenly deposited tax was rejected.

āš–ļø š—š˜‚š—±š—“š—ŗš—²š—»š˜: The services qualify as exports under Rule 6A of the Service Tax Rules. The amended definition of "Intermediary" does not apply as the dispute was for the period before the amendment. Case Info:

š—¢š—暝—±š—²š—æ š——š—®š˜š—²: 03 June 2024 šŸ“œ This ruling confirms that the services provided by the appellant are considered exports and are exempt from Service Tax. #CESTAT #ServiceTax #arr4nirc

More from @abhishekrajaramReply on Twitter

Page created with TweetHunter

Write your own