Abhishek Raja "Ram"
8 months ago
ā¢View on X
šš²ššš®š ššµš²š»š»š®š¶ š„šš¹š¶š»š“ š¼š» š§šš¦/šš¼šæšŗ š®š²šš¦ š³š¼šæ š¦š²šæšš¶š°š² š§š®š šš²šŗš®š»š±š š¢ š§šµš² š§šæš¶šÆšš»š®š¹ šµš²š¹š±: "Form 26AS of the Income Tax Act cannot be considered as the value of taxable services for the purpose of demand of service tax. Appeal allowed."
š šš®š°šš: šš½š½š²š¹š¹š®š»š: M/s. Jain Housing & Construction Limited ššššš²: Service tax demands based on Form 26AS/TDS statements are invalid; appeal allowed for residential project-related show-cause notices.
āļø ššš±š“š²šŗš²š»š: The Tribunal held that TDS/Form 26AS statements cannot solely determine taxable service value, citing Ahmedabad CESTAT's precedent in M/s. Reynolds Petro Chem Ltd. It ruled such demands unsustainable, setting aside the impugned order and affirming that Form 26AS cannot establish service tax liability.
š šš®šš² šš»š³š¼šæšŗš®šš¶š¼š»: š§š¶šš¹š²: M/s. Jain Housing & Construction Limited vs. The Commissioner of Service Tax š¢šæš±š²šæ šš®šš²: 24 February 2023 š This ruling clarifies that service tax demands cannot be based on TDS or Form 26AS under the Income Tax Act.
Page created with TweetHunter
Write your own