Abhishek Raja "Ram"

@abhishekrajaram

8 months ago

•View on X

š—–š—²š˜€š˜š—®š˜ š—–š—µš—²š—»š—»š—®š—¶ š—„š˜‚š—¹š—¶š—»š—“ š—¼š—» š—§š——š—¦/š—™š—¼š—æš—ŗ šŸ®šŸ²š—”š—¦ š—³š—¼š—æ š—¦š—²š—æš˜ƒš—¶š—°š—² š—§š—®š˜… š——š—²š—ŗš—®š—»š—±š˜€ šŸ“¢ š—§š—µš—² š—§š—æš—¶š—Æš˜‚š—»š—®š—¹ š—µš—²š—¹š—±: "Form 26AS of the Income Tax Act cannot be considered as the value of taxable services for the purpose of demand of service tax. Appeal allowed."

šŸ” š—™š—®š—°š˜š˜€: š—”š—½š—½š—²š—¹š—¹š—®š—»š˜: M/s. Jain Housing & Construction Limited š—œš˜€š˜€š˜‚š—²: Service tax demands based on Form 26AS/TDS statements are invalid; appeal allowed for residential project-related show-cause notices.

āš–ļø š—š˜‚š—±š—“š—²š—ŗš—²š—»š˜: The Tribunal held that TDS/Form 26AS statements cannot solely determine taxable service value, citing Ahmedabad CESTAT's precedent in M/s. Reynolds Petro Chem Ltd. It ruled such demands unsustainable, setting aside the impugned order and affirming that Form 26AS cannot establish service tax liability.

šŸ“œ š—–š—®š˜€š—² š—œš—»š—³š—¼š—æš—ŗš—®š˜š—¶š—¼š—»: š—§š—¶š˜š—¹š—²: M/s. Jain Housing & Construction Limited vs. The Commissioner of Service Tax š—¢š—æš—±š—²š—æ š——š—®š˜š—²: 24 February 2023 šŸ“œ This ruling clarifies that service tax demands cannot be based on TDS or Form 26AS under the Income Tax Act.

More from @abhishekrajaramReply on X

Page created with TweetHunter

Write your own