Raja Abhishek For NIRC 2024

@abhishekrajaram

3 months ago

โ€ขView on Twitter

๐—–๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—ง๐—”๐—ง ๐—–๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—ถ ๐—ฅ๐˜‚๐—น๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ง๐—ฎ๐˜…๐—ฎ๐—ฏ๐—น๐—ฒ ๐—ฆ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜ƒ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฒ ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐—ค๐˜‚๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฟ๐˜†๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐—˜๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐˜๐—ต๐˜„๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ธ ๐Ÿ“ข The Tribunal held: "The appellantโ€™s activity of quarrying and earthwork is covered under taxable service. The benefit of the notification is not applicable as services were not provided to the government or for road construction."

๐Ÿ” ๐—™๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐˜๐˜€: ๐—–๐—ผ๐—บ๐—ฝ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜†: M. Palanisamy ๐—œ๐˜€๐˜€๐˜‚๐—ฒ: Whether the appellantโ€™s activities are liable for service tax? ๐—”๐—ฐ๐˜๐—ถ๐˜ƒ๐—ถ๐˜๐˜†: The appellant provided services under "Works Contract Services" and "Transport of Goods." Service tax was demanded for quarrying, loading sand, and supplying equipment.

โš–๏ธ ๐—๐˜‚๐—ฑ๐—ด๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜: The Tribunal ruled that quarrying and loading activities are taxable under Section 65 (105) (zzzy) of the Finance Act, 1994. The appellant's exemption claim was denied as the services were not for government or road construction. The case was remanded to reassess the demand, and willful suppression was established.

๐—–๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐—œ๐—ป๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป: ๐—ง๐—ถ๐˜๐—น๐—ฒ: M. Palanisamy vs. Commissioner of GST & Central Excise ๐—ฆ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜ƒ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฒ ๐—ง๐—ฎ๐˜… ๐—”๐—ฝ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—ก๐—ผ. 41583 of 2017 ๐—ข๐—ฟ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐——๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฒ: 23 November 2023 ๐Ÿ“œ This ruling confirms that quarrying and earthwork activities are taxable, with no exemption for services not provided to the government or for road construction.

More from @abhishekrajaramReply on Twitter

Page created with TweetHunter

Write your own