Abhishek Raja "Ram"

@abhishekrajaram

4 days ago

ā€¢View on Twitter

š—–š—˜š—¦š—§š—”š—§ š—–š—µš—²š—»š—»š—®š—¶ š—„š˜‚š—¹š—¶š—»š—“ š—¼š—» š—¦š—µš—¼š˜„ š—–š—®š˜‚š˜€š—² š—”š—¼š˜š—¶š—°š—² š—®š—³š˜š—²š—æ š—£š—®š˜†š—ŗš—²š—»š˜ š—¼š—³ š—¦š—²š—暝˜ƒš—¶š—°š—² š—§š—®š˜… šŸ“¢ š—§š—µš—² š—§š—暝—¶š—Æš˜‚š—»š—®š—¹ š—µš—²š—¹š—±: "Show Cause Notice (SCN) is not to be issued when the assessee has paid the Service Tax along with interest. There is no evidence that the appellant suppressed facts to evade tax."

šŸ” š—™š—®š—°š˜š˜€: š—”š—½š—½š—²š—¹š—¹š—®š—»š˜: M/s. Servocraft HR Solutions Private Limited š—œš˜€š˜€š˜‚š—²: Imposition of penalties under Sections 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, after the appellant paid Service Tax with interest for the period from August 2010 to October 2010.

āš–ļø š—š˜‚š—±š—“š—²š—ŗš—²š—»š˜: The Tribunal held that no Show Cause Notice is needed under Section 73(3) when Service Tax with interest is paid. Since the appellant maintained transparent records and no evidence of suppression existed, penalties under Sections 77 and 78 were unwarranted and were set aside.

šŸ“œ š—–š—®š˜€š—² š—œš—»š—³š—¼š—暝—ŗš—®š˜š—¶š—¼š—»: š—§š—¶š˜š—¹š—²: M/s. Servocraft HR Solutions Private Limited Vs The Commissioner of Central Excise and Service Tax š—¦š—²š—暝˜ƒš—¶š—°š—² š—§š—®š˜… š—”š—½š—½š—²š—®š—¹ š—”š—¼. 40625 of 2013 š—¢š—暝—±š—²š—æ š——š—®š˜š—²: 07 March 2023 šŸ“œ This ruling reinforces that penalties cannot be imposed when Service Tax along with interest has been voluntarily paid, provided no intent to evade tax is established.

More from @abhishekrajaramReply on Twitter

Page created with TweetHunter

Write your own