Raja Abhishek For NIRC 2024

@abhishekrajaram

3 months ago

ā€¢View on Twitter

š—–š—˜š—¦š—§š—”š—§ š—–š—µš—²š—»š—»š—®š—¶ š—„š˜‚š—¹š—¶š—»š—“ š—¼š—» š—¦š—²š—暝˜ƒš—¶š—°š—² š—§š—®š˜… š—¼š—» š—¢š—°š—²š—®š—» š—™š—暝—²š—¶š—“š—µš˜ š—®š—»š—± š— š—®š—暝—ø-š˜‚š—½ š—–š—µš—®š—暝—“š—²š˜€ šŸ“¢ The Tribunal held: "Service tax cannot be levied on ocean freight, air freight, or the mark-up received by the appellant from freight charges during the disputed period."

šŸ” š—™š—®š—°š˜š˜€: š—–š—¼š—ŗš—½š—®š—»š˜†: M/s A.G.X. Logistics Private Limited š—œš˜€š˜€š˜‚š—²: Whether the appellant is liable to pay service tax on the mark-up received on freight charges?

š—”š—°š˜š—¶š˜ƒš—¶š˜š˜†: The appellant collected ocean freight charges from customers, including a mark-up over the actual freight charges paid to shipping companies. The department issued a show-cause notice demanding service tax on both the freight and the mark-up.

āš–ļø š—š˜‚š—±š—“š—²š—ŗš—²š—»š˜: The Tribunal ruled that both ocean and air freight, along with the mark-up, are not subject to service tax during the disputed period. The mark-up is considered trading of cargo space, not a service. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and the service tax demand was set aside.

š—–š—®š˜€š—² š—œš—»š—³š—¼š—暝—ŗš—®š˜š—¶š—¼š—»: š—§š—¶š˜š—¹š—²: M/s A.G.X. Logistics Private Limited vs. Commissioner of GST & Central Excise š—¦š—²š—暝˜ƒš—¶š—°š—² š—§š—®š˜… š—”š—½š—½š—²š—®š—¹ š—”š—¼. 42511 of 2017 š—¢š—暝—±š—²š—æ š——š—®š˜š—²: 12 December 2023 šŸ“œ This ruling confirms that ocean and air freight, along with mark-up on freight charges, are not subject to service tax.

More from @abhishekrajaramReply on Twitter

Page created with TweetHunter

Write your own