Abhishek Raja "Ram"

@abhishekrajaram

7 days ago

ā€¢View on Twitter

š—–š—˜š—¦š—§š—”š—§ š—–š—µš—²š—»š—»š—®š—¶ š—„š˜‚š—¹š—¶š—»š—“ š—¼š—» š—¦š—²š—暝˜ƒš—¶š—°š—² š—§š—®š˜… š—Ÿš—¶š—®š—Æš—¶š—¹š—¶š˜š˜† š—³š—¼š—æ š—¦š—¼š—³š˜š˜„š—®š—暝—² š—£š˜‚š—暝—°š—µš—®š˜€š—²š—± š—³š—暝—¼š—ŗ š—”š—Æš—暝—¼š—®š—± šŸ“¢ š—§š—µš—² š—§š—暝—¶š—Æš˜‚š—»š—®š—¹ š—µš—²š—¹š—±: "In the absence of evidence proving services rendered in India, the appellant is not liable to pay service tax under the reverse charge mechanism."

šŸ” š—™š—®š—°š˜š˜€: š—£š—®š—暝˜š—¶š—²š˜€: M/s. Dassault Systemes Simulia Private Limited vs. The Commissioner of Central Excise and Service Tax. š—œš˜€š˜€š˜‚š—²: Whether the appellant is liable to pay service tax under the reverse charge mechanism for services allegedly rendered in India? š—”š—°š˜š—¶š˜ƒš—¶š˜š˜†: The appellant purchased software from the U.S., claimed no services were rendered in India, and disputed service tax under reverse charge.

āš–ļø š—š˜‚š—±š—“š—²š—ŗš—²š—»š˜: The Tribunal ruled that the software is treated as goods, with services performed in India. The Revenue failed to provide evidence that services were rendered in India, and as a result, the reverse charge mechanism under Section 66A was deemed inapplicable. The appeal was allowed, and the service tax demand was dismissed.

š—–š—®š˜€š—² š—œš—»š—³š—¼š—暝—ŗš—®š˜š—¶š—¼š—»: š—§š—¶š˜š—¹š—²: M/s. Dassault Systemes Simulia Private Limited vs. The Commissioner of Central Excise and Service Tax. š—¢š—暝—±š—²š—æ š——š—®š˜š—²: 24 March 2023 šŸ“œ This ruling clarifies that service tax under reverse charge cannot be demanded without clear evidence of services rendered outside India by a foreign service provider.

More from @abhishekrajaramReply on Twitter

Page created with TweetHunter

Write your own