Raja Abhishek For NIRC 2024

@abhishekrajaram

about 1 month ago

ā€¢View on Twitter

š—–š—˜š—¦š—§š—”š—§ š—–š—µš—²š—»š—»š—®š—¶ š—„š˜‚š—¹š—¶š—»š—“ š—¼š—» š—¦š—²š—暝˜ƒš—¶š—°š—² š—§š—®š˜… š—³š—¼š—æ š—©š—²š˜€š˜€š—²š—¹ š—–š—µš—®š—暝˜š—²š—暝˜€ š—®š—»š—± š—¦š—²š—°š˜‚š—暝—¶š˜š˜† š——š—²š—½š—¼š˜€š—¶š˜š˜€ šŸ“¢ š—§š—µš—² š—§š—暝—¶š—Æš˜‚š—»š—®š—¹ š—暝˜‚š—¹š—²š—±: "Providing vessels to a group company for export is not for transfer of right to use the vessels; therefore, no service tax is leviable under 'supply of tangible goods for use.'"

šŸ” š—™š—®š—°š˜š˜€: š—–š—¼š—ŗš—½š—®š—»š˜†: M/s. Core Minerals š—œš˜€š˜€š˜‚š—²: M/s. Core Minerals, contracted to transport cobblestone via voyage charter and provided vessels on a time charter to a group company. A show cause notice demanded service tax for "Supply of Tangible Goods Service" for 2008-10 and on a property rental security deposit, including interest and penalties.

āš–ļø š—š˜‚š—±š—“š—ŗš—²š—»š˜: The Tribunal ruled that the voyage charter did not transfer the right to use the vessel, exempting it from service tax under "supply of tangible goods for use." The time charter lacked grounds for tax demands or penalties, and the refundable security deposit was non-taxable. The appeal was allowed.

šŸ“œ š—–š—®š˜€š—² š—œš—»š—³š—¼š—暝—ŗš—®š˜š—¶š—¼š—»: š—§š—¶š˜š—¹š—²: M/s. Core Minerals vs. The Commissioner of Service Tax š—¦š—²š—暝˜ƒš—¶š—°š—² š—§š—®š˜… š—”š—½š—½š—²š—®š—¹ š—”š—¼. 42451 of 2013 š—¢š—暝—±š—²š—æ š——š—®š˜š—²: 15 June 2023 šŸ“œ This ruling confirms that vessel charters without a transfer of use rights and refundable security deposits for rentals are not subject to service tax.

More from @abhishekrajaramReply on Twitter

Page created with TweetHunter

Write your own