Abhishek Raja "Ram"

@abhishekrajaram

8 months ago

โ€ขView on X

๐—–๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜๐—ฎ๐˜ ๐—–๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—ถ ๐—ฅ๐˜‚๐—น๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ฆ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜ƒ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฒ ๐—ง๐—ฎ๐˜… ๐—˜๐˜…๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ฝ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐—ช๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ธ๐˜€ ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐˜๐˜€ ๐Ÿ“ข ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ง๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ฏ๐˜‚๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—น๐—ฑ: Service tax exemption under Section 102 requires contracts before 01.03.2015. Appellant's 19.03.2015 contract disqualifies exemption. Appeal dismissed.

๐Ÿ” ๐—™๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐˜๐˜€: ๐—”๐—ฝ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—น๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜: M/s. P. Natesan & Co. ๐—œ๐˜€๐˜€๐˜‚๐—ฒ: Refund of service tax denied as exemption under Section 102 requires contracts entered before 01.03.2015; appeal dismissed.

โš–๏ธ ๐—๐˜‚๐—ฑ๐—ด๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜: The Tribunal held that mere receipt or opening of a tender isn't acceptance; explicit communication is required. Section 102 exempts service tax only for contracts entered before 01.03.2015. As the appellantโ€™s contract was dated 19.03.2015, they were ineligible for exemption, and statutory provisions prevailed over the Head Office's letter.

๐Ÿ“œ ๐—–๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐—œ๐—ป๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป: ๐—ง๐—ถ๐˜๐—น๐—ฒ: M/s. P. Natesan & Co. vs. Commissioner of GST & Central Excise ๐—ข๐—ฟ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐——๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฒ: 14 December 2022 ๐Ÿ“œ This ruling underscores the importance of statutory timelines in claiming service tax exemptions.

More from @abhishekrajaramReply on X

Page created with TweetHunter

Write your own