Raja Abhishek For NIRC 2024

@abhishekrajaram

about 2 months ago

ā€¢View on Twitter

š—–š—˜š—¦š—§š—”š—§ š—–š—µš—²š—»š—»š—®š—¶ š—„š˜‚š—¹š—¶š—»š—“ š—¼š—» š—¦š—²š—暝˜ƒš—¶š—°š—² š—§š—®š˜… š—˜š˜…š—²š—ŗš—½š˜š—¶š—¼š—» š—³š—¼š—æ š—¦š—˜š—­ š—–š—¦š—„ š—”š—°š˜š—¶š˜ƒš—¶š˜š—¶š—²š˜€ šŸ“¢ š—§š—µš—² š—§š—暝—¶š—Æš˜‚š—»š—®š—¹ š—暝˜‚š—¹š—²š—±: "Service tax exemption for SEZ units does not require that services be consumed strictly within SEZ premises. CSR-related works contract services with a direct nexus to SEZ activities are eligible for exemption."

šŸ” š—™š—®š—°š˜š˜€: š—–š—¼š—ŗš—½š—®š—»š˜†: M/s. ATC Tires Private Limited š—œš˜€š˜€š˜‚š—²: The appellant, a manufacturer operating in a Special Economic Zone (SEZ), was denied service tax exemption on works contract, security services, and vehicle rental on the grounds that these services were consumed outside the SEZ. The appellant argued that these services were part of CSR activities related to its SEZ operations.

āš–ļø š—š˜‚š—±š—“š—ŗš—²š—»š˜: The Tribunal ruled that SEZ service tax exemptions apply to CSR-related services if they support authorized SEZ operations, even if used outside SEZ boundaries. Services like constructing dormitories and security for laborers were deemed integral to SEZ functioning, allowing the appeal and exempting the appellant from service tax.

šŸ“œ š—–š—®š˜€š—² š—œš—»š—³š—¼š—暝—ŗš—®š˜š—¶š—¼š—»: š—§š—¶š˜š—¹š—²: M/s. ATC Tires Private Limited vs. Commissioner of G.S.T. and Central Excise š—¦š—²š—暝˜ƒš—¶š—°š—² š—§š—®š˜… š—”š—½š—½š—²š—®š—¹ š—”š—¼. 40349 of 2021 š—¢š—暝—±š—²š—æ š——š—®š˜š—²: 10 August 2023 šŸ“œ This ruling affirms that SEZ units can claim service tax exemptions on services used for CSR activities directly linked to their operations, even if they extend beyond SEZ premises.

More from @abhishekrajaramReply on Twitter

Page created with TweetHunter

Write your own