Raja Abhishek For NIRC 2024

@abhishekrajaram

about 2 months ago

โ€ขView on Twitter

๐—–๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—ง๐—”๐—ง ๐—–๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—ถ ๐—ฅ๐˜‚๐—น๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ฆ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜ƒ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฒ ๐—ง๐—ฎ๐˜… ๐—˜๐˜…๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ฝ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐—ฃ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ธ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—”๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐˜€ ๐Ÿ“ข ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ง๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ฏ๐˜‚๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—ฟ๐˜‚๐—น๐—ฒ๐—ฑ: "Land or buildings used specifically for parking are exempt from Service Tax as they qualify as immovable property."

๐Ÿ” ๐—™๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐˜๐˜€: ๐—–๐—ผ๐—บ๐—ฝ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜†: M/s. Brookefields Estates Private Limited ๐—œ๐˜€๐˜€๐˜‚๐—ฒ: The appellant filed a refund claim for Service Tax paid on parking charges, asserting that parking areas fall outside the definition of taxable โ€œRenting of Immovable Property Servicesโ€ (RIPS). A Show Cause Notice challenged this, arguing that the parking space was not exempt as immovable property for RIPS purposes.

โš–๏ธ ๐—๐˜‚๐—ฑ๐—ด๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜: The Tribunal ruled that parking areas, even if built structures, qualify as exempt immovable property under Section 65(105) (zzzz) of the Finance Act. Consequently, parking spaces are not taxable under Renting of Immovable Property Services (RIPS), and the rejection of the appellantโ€™s refund claim was deemed unjustified.

๐Ÿ“œ ๐—–๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐—œ๐—ป๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป: ๐—ง๐—ถ๐˜๐—น๐—ฒ: M/s. Brookefields Estates Private Limited vs. Commissioner of Central Excise and Service Tax ๐—ฆ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜ƒ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฒ ๐—ง๐—ฎ๐˜… ๐—”๐—ฝ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—ก๐—ผ. 40814 of 2014 ๐—ข๐—ฟ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐——๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฒ: 10 August 2023 This decision confirms that land or structures specifically designated for parking are not subject to Service Tax under RIPS, allowing entities providing such spaces to seek refunds on previously paid taxes.

More from @abhishekrajaramReply on Twitter

Page created with TweetHunter

Write your own