Abhishek Raja "Ram"
8 months ago
ā¢View on X
šš²ššš®š ššµš²š»š»š®š¶ š„šš¹š¶š»š“ š¼š» š¦š²šæšš¶š°š² š§š®š šš±š·ššššŗš²š»š š¢ š§šµš² š§šæš¶šÆšš»š®š¹ šµš²š¹š±: "Tax already paid to the Government can be adjusted towards liability for a subsequent period. Assessee need not follow the refund process under Section 11B. Appeal allowed."
š šš®š°šš: šš½š½š²š¹š¹š®š»š: M/s. Aircel Limited ššššš²: Adjustment of Service Tax towards subsequent liability under Rule 6(3) is valid when unjust enrichment is avoided. Aircel's adjustments through credit notes on shared recharges were upheld.
āļø ššš±š“š²šŗš²š»š: The Tribunal upheld that tax adjustments via credit notes were valid, preventing unjust enrichment. Rule 6(3)'s refund conditions aim to avoid unjust enrichment but don't mandate refunds unnecessarily. This allowed instant relief to the assessee without breaching equity principles.
š šš®šš² šš»š³š¼šæšŗš®šš¶š¼š»: š§š¶šš¹š²: M/s. Aircel Limited vs. The Commissioner of Central Excise and Service Tax š¢šæš±š²šæ šš®šš²: 9 February 2023 š This ruling confirms that Service Tax adjustments for subsequent liability are permissible when conditions of unjust enrichment are satisfied.
Page created with TweetHunter
Write your own