Raja Abhishek For NIRC 2024

@abhishekrajaram

2 months ago

โ€ขView on Twitter

๐—–๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—ง๐—”๐—ง ๐—–๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—ถ ๐—ฅ๐˜‚๐—น๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ฅ๐—ฒ๐—ณ๐˜‚๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐—ฆ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜ƒ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฒ ๐—ง๐—ฎ๐˜… ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ฅ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜๐—ถ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—–๐—ผ๐—บ๐—ฝ๐—น๐—ฒ๐˜…๐—ฒ๐˜€ ๐Ÿ“ข The Tribunal held: "Since the appellant bore the tax incidence for a flat intended for personal use, refund denial was unfounded. The appellant is entitled to the refund."

๐Ÿ” ๐—™๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐˜๐˜€: ๐—–๐—ผ๐—บ๐—ฝ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜†: Smt. Sheela Vimala Rani โš–๏ธ ๐—œ๐˜€๐˜€๐˜‚๐—ฒ: Is the appellantโ€™s claim for a refund of service tax on her flat purchase valid? ๐—”๐—ฐ๐˜๐—ถ๐˜ƒ๐—ถ๐˜๐˜†: Purchased a flat in a residential complex for personal use and paid service tax, later seeking a refund under CBEC Circular No. 108/02/2009-S.T.

โš–๏ธ ๐—๐˜‚๐—ฑ๐—ด๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜: The Tribunal ruled that the refund claim was timely, as it was filed within one year per Section 11B, rendering the time-bar claim invalid. Since the appellant paid the service tax included in the builderโ€™s consideration, the appeal was allowed, and the refund was granted.

๐—–๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐—œ๐—ป๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป: ๐—ง๐—ถ๐˜๐—น๐—ฒ: Smt. Sheela Vimala Rani vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Madurai ๐—ฆ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜ƒ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฒ ๐—ง๐—ฎ๐˜… ๐—”๐—ฝ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—ก๐—ผ. 42180 of 2013 ๐—ข๐—ฟ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐——๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฒ: 11 October 2023 ๐Ÿ“œ This ruling affirms the right to a refund on service tax for flats intended for personal use if the tax was borne by the buyer.

More from @abhishekrajaramReply on Twitter

Page created with TweetHunter

Write your own