Raja Abhishek For NIRC 2024
2 months ago
๐๐๐ฆ๐ง๐๐ง ๐๐ต๐ฒ๐ป๐ป๐ฎ๐ถ ๐ฅ๐๐น๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐ผ๐ป ๐ฅ๐ฒ๐ณ๐๐ป๐ฑ ๐ผ๐ณ ๐ฆ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฒ ๐ง๐ฎ๐ ๐ผ๐ป ๐ฅ๐ฒ๐๐ถ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ป๐๐ถ๐ฎ๐น ๐๐ผ๐บ๐ฝ๐น๐ฒ๐ ๐ฒ๐ ๐ข The Tribunal held: "Since the appellant bore the tax incidence for a flat intended for personal use, refund denial was unfounded. The appellant is entitled to the refund."
๐ ๐๐ฎ๐ฐ๐๐: ๐๐ผ๐บ๐ฝ๐ฎ๐ป๐: Smt. Sheela Vimala Rani โ๏ธ ๐๐๐๐๐ฒ: Is the appellantโs claim for a refund of service tax on her flat purchase valid? ๐๐ฐ๐๐ถ๐๐ถ๐๐: Purchased a flat in a residential complex for personal use and paid service tax, later seeking a refund under CBEC Circular No. 108/02/2009-S.T.
โ๏ธ ๐๐๐ฑ๐ด๐ฒ๐บ๐ฒ๐ป๐: The Tribunal ruled that the refund claim was timely, as it was filed within one year per Section 11B, rendering the time-bar claim invalid. Since the appellant paid the service tax included in the builderโs consideration, the appeal was allowed, and the refund was granted.
๐๐ฎ๐๐ฒ ๐๐ป๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ๐บ๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป: ๐ง๐ถ๐๐น๐ฒ: Smt. Sheela Vimala Rani vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Madurai ๐ฆ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฒ ๐ง๐ฎ๐ ๐๐ฝ๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐น ๐ก๐ผ. 42180 of 2013 ๐ข๐ฟ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐๐ฎ๐๐ฒ: 11 October 2023 ๐ This ruling affirms the right to a refund on service tax for flats intended for personal use if the tax was borne by the buyer.
Page created with TweetHunter
Write your own