Raja Abhishek For NIRC 2024

@abhishekrajaram

about 1 month ago

ā€¢View on Twitter

š—–š—˜š—¦š—§š—”š—§ š—–š—µš—²š—»š—»š—®š—¶ š—„š˜‚š—¹š—¶š—»š—“ š—¼š—» š—„š—²š—³š˜‚š—»š—± š—–š—¹š—®š—¶š—ŗš˜€ š—®š—»š—± š—”š—½š—½š—¹š—¶š—°š—®š—Æš—¶š—¹š—¶š˜š˜† š—¼š—³ š—§š—¶š—ŗš—² š—Ÿš—¶š—ŗš—¶š˜ š˜‚š—»š—±š—²š—æ š—¦š—²š—°š˜š—¶š—¼š—» šŸ­šŸ­š—• šŸ“¢ š—§š—µš—² š—§š—暝—¶š—Æš˜‚š—»š—®š—¹ š—暝˜‚š—¹š—²š—±: "Section 11B sets the time limit for refund claims, and this statutory provision cannot be overridden by subordinate notifications."

šŸ” š—™š—®š—°š˜š˜€: š—–š—¼š—ŗš—½š—®š—»š˜†: M/s JVS Export āš–ļø š—œš˜€š˜€š˜‚š—²: Is the appellant entitled to a refund of Service Tax paid on commission despite the time limits specified in subordinate notifications?

šŸ“ š—š˜‚š—±š—“š—ŗš—²š—»š˜: The Tribunal ruled that Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, with a one-year limit on refund claims, overrides subordinate notifications. Referring to the Apex Court's ruling, it confirmed that statutory provisions prevail over notifications. The appellant's timely claim, based on a mistaken exemption interpretation, was thus allowed, granting the refund.

šŸ“œ š—–š—®š˜€š—² š—œš—»š—³š—¼š—暝—ŗš—®š˜š—¶š—¼š—»: š—§š—¶š˜š—¹š—²: M/s JVS Export vs. Commissioner of GST & Central Excise š—¢š—暝—±š—²š—æ š——š—®š˜š—²: 5 July 2023 This judgment reinforces the supremacy of Section 11B for calculating refund claim time limits, affirming that statutory provisions override notifications.

More from @abhishekrajaramReply on Twitter

Page created with TweetHunter

Write your own