Raja Abhishek For NIRC 2024
about 1 month ago
ššš¦š§šš§ ššµš²š»š»š®š¶ š„šš¹š¶š»š“ š¼š» š„š²š³šš»š± šš¹š®š¶šŗš š®š»š± šš½š½š¹š¶š°š®šÆš¶š¹š¶šš š¼š³ š§š¶šŗš² šš¶šŗš¶š šš»š±š²šæ š¦š²š°šš¶š¼š» ššš š¢ š§šµš² š§šæš¶šÆšš»š®š¹ šæšš¹š²š±: "Section 11B sets the time limit for refund claims, and this statutory provision cannot be overridden by subordinate notifications."
š šš®š°šš: šš¼šŗš½š®š»š: M/s JVS Export āļø ššššš²: Is the appellant entitled to a refund of Service Tax paid on commission despite the time limits specified in subordinate notifications?
š ššš±š“šŗš²š»š: The Tribunal ruled that Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, with a one-year limit on refund claims, overrides subordinate notifications. Referring to the Apex Court's ruling, it confirmed that statutory provisions prevail over notifications. The appellant's timely claim, based on a mistaken exemption interpretation, was thus allowed, granting the refund.
š šš®šš² šš»š³š¼šæšŗš®šš¶š¼š»: š§š¶šš¹š²: M/s JVS Export vs. Commissioner of GST & Central Excise š¢šæš±š²šæ šš®šš²: 5 July 2023 This judgment reinforces the supremacy of Section 11B for calculating refund claim time limits, affirming that statutory provisions override notifications.
Page created with TweetHunter
Write your own