Abhishek Raja "Ram"
8 months ago
ā¢View on X
šš²ššš®š ššµš²š»š»š®š¶ š„šš¹š¶š»š“ š¼š» š„š²š³šš»š± šš¹š®š¶šŗ š³š¼šæ šš š½š¼šæšš š¢ š§šµš² š§šæš¶šÆšš»š®š¹ šµš²š¹š±: "Refund claims for exports cannot be denied based on photocopies of invoices. Appeal allowed."
š šš®š°šš: šš½š½š²š¹š¹š®š»š: M/s. Core Minerals ššššš²: Refund claims cannot be denied solely for non-submission of original invoices if photocopies meet Notification No. 17/2009-S.T. requirements for services used in exporting goods. Appeal allowed.
āļø ššš±š“š²šŗš²š»š: The Tribunal ruled that Notification No. 17/2009-S.T. does not mandate original invoices for refund claims. The appellant provided sufficient documents, including photocopies, meeting the Notification's requirements. The rejection by lower authorities was deemed erroneous as it relied on criteria not specified in the subordinate legislation. Refund was granted.
š šš®šš² šš»š³š¼šæšŗš®šš¶š¼š»: š§š¶šš¹š²: M/s. Core Minerals vs. The Commissioner of Service Tax š¢šæš±š²šæ šš®šš²: 22 February 2023 š This ruling affirms that refunds cannot be denied solely due to submission of photocopied invoices if the notification requirements are otherwise met.
Page created with TweetHunter
Write your own