Abhishek Raja "Ram"
8 months ago
โขView on X
๐๐ฒ๐๐๐ฎ๐ ๐๐ต๐ฒ๐ป๐ป๐ฎ๐ถ ๐ฅ๐๐น๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐ผ๐ป ๐ฃ๐ฒ๐ป๐ฎ๐น๐๐ ๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ ๐ก๐ผ๐ป-๐ฃ๐ฎ๐๐บ๐ฒ๐ป๐ ๐ผ๐ณ ๐ฆ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฒ ๐ง๐ฎ๐ ๐ข ๐ง๐ต๐ฒ ๐ง๐ฟ๐ถ๐ฏ๐๐ป๐ฎ๐น ๐ต๐ฒ๐น๐ฑ: "As the appellant failed to pay the reduced penalty of 25% along with tax and interest within the prescribed time, the demand of penalty under the extended period of limitation is upheld. Appeal rejected."
๐ ๐๐ฎ๐ฐ๐๐: ๐๐ฝ๐ฝ๐ฒ๐น๐น๐ฎ๐ป๐: M/s. Nebula Computers Pvt. Ltd. ๐๐๐๐๐ฒ: The appellant failed to remit โน50,55,167 service tax, delayed ST-3 returns, and faced penalties per show-cause notice.
โ๏ธ ๐๐๐ฑ๐ด๐ฒ๐บ๐ฒ๐ป๐: The Tribunal rejected the appellantโs financial hardship claim, noting failure to pay the reduced 25% penalty, tax, and interest within one month of the SCN issuance. In cases of wilful suppression or fraud, timely payment concludes proceedings. The delay justified the extended penalty demand, and the appeal lacked merit.
๐ ๐๐ฎ๐๐ฒ ๐๐ป๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ๐บ๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป: ๐ง๐ถ๐๐น๐ฒ: M/s. Nebula Computers Pvt. Ltd. vs. Commissioner of GST & Central Excise ๐ข๐ฟ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐๐ฎ๐๐ฒ: 22 February 2023 ๐ This ruling emphasizes strict adherence to payment timelines for penalties under service tax laws.
Page created with TweetHunter
Write your own