Abhishek Raja "Ram"

@abhishekrajaram

8 months ago

โ€ขView on X

๐—–๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜๐—ฎ๐˜ ๐—–๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—ถ ๐—ฅ๐˜‚๐—น๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ฃ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—น๐˜๐˜† ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐—ก๐—ผ๐—ป-๐—ฃ๐—ฎ๐˜†๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜ ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐—ฆ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜ƒ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฒ ๐—ง๐—ฎ๐˜… ๐Ÿ“ข ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ง๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ฏ๐˜‚๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—น๐—ฑ: "As the appellant failed to pay the reduced penalty of 25% along with tax and interest within the prescribed time, the demand of penalty under the extended period of limitation is upheld. Appeal rejected."

๐Ÿ” ๐—™๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐˜๐˜€: ๐—”๐—ฝ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—น๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜: M/s. Nebula Computers Pvt. Ltd. ๐—œ๐˜€๐˜€๐˜‚๐—ฒ: The appellant failed to remit โ‚น50,55,167 service tax, delayed ST-3 returns, and faced penalties per show-cause notice.

โš–๏ธ ๐—๐˜‚๐—ฑ๐—ด๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜: The Tribunal rejected the appellantโ€™s financial hardship claim, noting failure to pay the reduced 25% penalty, tax, and interest within one month of the SCN issuance. In cases of wilful suppression or fraud, timely payment concludes proceedings. The delay justified the extended penalty demand, and the appeal lacked merit.

๐Ÿ“œ ๐—–๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐—œ๐—ป๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป: ๐—ง๐—ถ๐˜๐—น๐—ฒ: M/s. Nebula Computers Pvt. Ltd. vs. Commissioner of GST & Central Excise ๐—ข๐—ฟ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐——๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฒ: 22 February 2023 ๐Ÿ“œ This ruling emphasizes strict adherence to payment timelines for penalties under service tax laws.

More from @abhishekrajaramReply on X

Page created with TweetHunter

Write your own