Raja Abhishek For NIRC 2024
2 months ago
ššš¦š§šš§ ššµš²š»š»š®š¶ š„šš¹š¶š»š“ š¼š» š£š²š»š®š¹šš¶š²š š³š¼šæ š§š®š š²š š¼š» šš®š»š± š®š»š± ššš¶š¹š±š¶š»š“ š¦š²šæšš¶š°š²š š¢ The Tribunal held: "Given the interpretational nature of land and building tax issues, the appellant qualifies for penalty waiver."
š šš®š°šš: šš¼šŗš½š®š»š: Executive Officer, Karamadai Town Panchayat ššššš²: Are the imposition of penalty and late fee valid? šš°šš¶šš¶šš: The appellant provided "Renting of Immovable Property Service" but did not pay service tax on time or file ST-3 returns.
āļø ššš±š“š²šŗš²š»š: The Tribunal ruled that the dispute over "taxes on lands and buildings" is interpretational, granting the appellant sufficient grounds for delayed tax payment without intent to evade. Consequently, the appellant is eligible for a penalty waiver under Section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994. The appeal was allowed, waiving all penalties.
šš®šš² šš»š³š¼šæšŗš®šš¶š¼š»: š§š¶šš¹š²: Executive Officer, Karamadai Town Panchayat vs. Commissioner of GST & Central Excise š¦š²šæšš¶š°š² š§š®š šš½š½š²š®š¹ š”š¼. 40948 of 2014 š¢šæš±š²šæ šš®šš²: 22 September 2023 š This ruling underscores that constitutional and interpretational tax disputes justify penalty waivers.
Page created with TweetHunter
Write your own