Raja Abhishek For NIRC 2024
about 2 months ago
ššš¦š§šš§ ššµš²š»š»š®š¶ š„šš¹š¶š»š“ š¼š» šš¶š¾šš¶š±š®šš²š± šš®šŗš®š“š²š š®š»š± šš®š»šø ššš®šæš®š»šš²š² šš»š°š®ššµšŗš²š»š š¢ The Tribunal held: "Encashment of performance/bank guarantees and amounts retained as liquidated damages are not a consideration for the provision of any service and thus are not subject to service tax."
š šš®š°šš: šš¼šŗš½š®š»š: Chennai Metro Rail Ltd. (CMRL) ššššš²: Are liquidated damages and bank guarantee encashments subject to service tax? šš°šš¶šš¶šš: CMRL encashed bank guarantees and retained amounts as liquidated damages due to contractor non-performance.
āļø ššš±š“š²šŗš²š»š: The Tribunal ruled that damages collected for non-performance are not taxable as they are not consideration for tolerating an act, per CBIC Circular No. 214/1/2023-ST. With no contractual basis to imply payment for tolerating breaches, all service tax demands, interest, and penalties were set aside.
šš®šš² šš»š³š¼šæšŗš®šš¶š¼š»: š§š¶šš¹š²: Chennai Metro Rail Ltd. vs. Commissioner of GST & Central Excise š¦š²šæšš¶š°š² š§š®š šš½š½š²š®š¹ š”š¼. 40046 of 2020 š¢šæš±š²šæ šš®šš²: 12 September 2023 š This ruling reinforces that liquidated damages and similar compensatory payments do not constitute taxable services.
Page created with TweetHunter
Write your own