Raja Abhishek For NIRC 2024

@abhishekrajaram

2 months ago

ā€¢View on Twitter

š—–š—˜š—¦š—§š—”š—§ š—–š—µš—²š—»š—»š—®š—¶ š—„š˜‚š—¹š—¶š—»š—“ š—¼š—» š—œš—»š˜š—²š—暝—»š—®š˜š—¶š—¼š—»š—®š—¹ š—„š—¼š—®š—ŗš—¶š—»š—“ š—¦š—²š—暝˜ƒš—¶š—°š—²š˜€ š—®š—»š—± š—„š—²š˜ƒš—²š—暝˜€š—² š—–š—µš—®š—暝—“š—² š— š—²š—°š—µš—®š—»š—¶š˜€š—ŗ (š—„š—–š— ) šŸ“¢ The Tribunal held: "Telecommunication services provided during international outbound roaming are not taxable under RCM, as the foreign telecom operator (FTO) is not a 'telegraph authority.'"

šŸ” š—™š—®š—°š˜š˜€: š—–š—¼š—ŗš—½š—®š—»š˜†: M/s. Vodafone Idea Ltd. š—œš˜€š˜€š˜‚š—²: Are international outbound roaming services taxable under BAS and RCM? š—”š—°š˜š—¶š˜ƒš—¶š˜š˜†: Appellant arranged international outbound roaming through foreign telecom operators and was charged by the FTO, passing charges to its customers.

āš–ļø š—š˜‚š—±š—“š—²š—ŗš—²š—»š˜: The Tribunal ruled that during international outbound roaming, the foreign telecom operator (FTO) is the primary service provider, and these services qualify as telecommunication. Since the FTO is not a 'telegraph authority,' the services are not taxable under Reverse Charge Mechanism. The appeal was allowed for the appellant.

š—–š—®š˜€š—² š—œš—»š—³š—¼š—暝—ŗš—®š˜š—¶š—¼š—»: š—§š—¶š˜š—¹š—²: M/s. Vodafone Idea Ltd. vs. Commissioner of GST & Central Excise š—¦š—²š—暝˜ƒš—¶š—°š—² š—§š—®š˜… š—”š—½š—½š—²š—®š—¹ š—”š—¼. 41808/2014 š—¢š—暝—±š—²š—æ š——š—®š˜š—²: 10 October 2023 šŸ“œ This ruling clarifies that telecommunication services during international roaming by non-telegraph authorities are not subject to service tax under RCM.

More from @abhishekrajaramReply on Twitter

Page created with TweetHunter

Write your own