Raja Abhishek For NIRC 2024

@abhishekrajaram

1 day ago

ā€¢View on Twitter

š—–š—˜š—¦š—§š—”š—§ š—–š—µš—²š—»š—»š—®š—¶ š—„š˜‚š—¹š—¶š—»š—“ š—¼š—» š—–š—¹š—²š—®š—暝—¶š—»š—“ š—®š—»š—± š—™š—¼š—暝˜„š—®š—暝—±š—¶š—»š—“ š—¦š—²š—暝˜ƒš—¶š—°š—²š˜€ š—®š—»š—± š—§š—®š˜…š—®š—Æš—¹š—² š—©š—®š—¹š˜‚š—² šŸ“¢ The Tribunal held: "If clearing and forwarding services are provided by the same person under separate agreements, freight forwarding charges must be included in the taxable value for C & F services."

šŸ” š—™š—®š—°š˜š˜€: š—–š—¼š—ŗš—½š—®š—»š˜†: M/s T. Kolandasamy š—œš˜€š˜€š˜‚š—²: Whether the appellant was required to include freight charges in the taxable value for Clearing and Forwarding (C & F) services?

š—”š—°š˜š—¶š˜ƒš—¶š˜š˜†: The appellant provided clearing and forwarding services to Ultra Tech Cements and Zuari Cements. Separate invoices for freight were issued without service tax. A show-cause notice was issued for short payment of service tax.

š—š˜‚š—±š—“š—²š—ŗš—²š—»š˜: The Tribunal ruled that freight charges should be included in the taxable value for C & F services. However, since Ultra Tech Cement paid service tax under GTA services, the appellant had no intent to evade taxes. The extended period of limitation was not applicable, and the demand and penalties were set aside.

š—–š—®š˜€š—² š—œš—»š—³š—¼š—暝—ŗš—®š˜š—¶š—¼š—»: š—§š—¶š˜š—¹š—²: M/s T. Kolandasamy vs. The Commissioner of Central Excise š—¦š—˜š—„š—©š—œš—–š—˜ š—§š—”š—« š—”š—£š—£š—˜š—”š—Ÿ š—”š—¼. 42202 of 2014 š—¢š—暝—±š—²š—æ š——š—®š˜š—²: 14 December 2023

šŸ“œ This ruling clarifies that freight forwarding charges must be included in the taxable value for C & F services, but extended period demands are not applicable if no tax evasion intent is found.

More from @abhishekrajaramReply on Twitter

Page created with TweetHunter

Write your own