Raja Abhishek For NIRC 2024

@abhishekrajaram

3 months ago

โ€ขView on Twitter

๐—–๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—ง๐—”๐—ง ๐—–๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—ถ ๐—ฅ๐˜‚๐—น๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—–๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜ƒ๐—ฎ๐˜ ๐—–๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐˜ ๐——๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ถ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—•๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—œ๐—ป๐˜ƒ๐—ผ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฒ ๐—ก๐—ฎ๐—บ๐—ฒ ๐Ÿ“ข The Tribunal held: "Credit cannot be denied solely because invoices bear the vehicle owner's name; this is a procedural infraction that does not justify credit disallowance."

๐Ÿ” ๐—™๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐˜๐˜€: ๐—–๐—ผ๐—บ๐—ฝ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜†: M/s. United India Insurance Company Ltd ๐—œ๐˜€๐˜€๐˜‚๐—ฒ: Can credit be disallowed if invoices list the vehicle ownerโ€™s name instead of the assesseeโ€™s? ๐—”๐—ฐ๐˜๐—ถ๐˜ƒ๐—ถ๐˜๐˜†: CENVAT credit was disallowed for service tax on motor vehicle repairs, as invoices listed the names of vehicle owners rather than the appellant.

โš–๏ธ ๐—๐˜‚๐—ฑ๐—ด๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜: The Tribunal ruled that listing the vehicle ownerโ€™s name on invoices is a procedural issue and does not justify denying CENVAT credit, as the appellant is otherwise eligible. The Commissioner (Appeals) correctly allowed credit, and the refund was sanctioned. The appeal was allowed, dismissing the Department's appeal.

๐—–๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐—œ๐—ป๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป: ๐—ง๐—ถ๐˜๐—น๐—ฒ: M/s. United India Insurance Company Ltd vs. Commissioner of GST and Central Excise ๐—ฆ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜ƒ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฒ ๐—ง๐—ฎ๐˜… ๐—”๐—ฝ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—ก๐—ผ. 40613 of 2013 ๐—ข๐—ฟ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐——๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฒ: 26 October 2023 ๐Ÿ“œ This ruling confirms that procedural infractions on invoices, like naming the vehicle owner, do not justify CENVAT credit denial.

More from @abhishekrajaramReply on Twitter

Page created with TweetHunter

Write your own