Raja Abhishek For NIRC 2024

@abhishekrajaram

2 months ago

โ€ขView on Twitter

๐—–๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—ง๐—”๐—ง ๐—–๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—ถ ๐—ฅ๐˜‚๐—น๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—–๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜ƒ๐—ฎ๐˜ ๐—–๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐˜ ๐——๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ถ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐—ฅ๐—ฒ๐—ณ๐˜‚๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐—–๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐—บ ๐—ฅ๐—ฒ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜€๐—ฎ๐—น ๐Ÿ“ข The Tribunal held: "Cenvat credit cannot be denied solely because premises are unregistered, nor should credit be reversed again simply because cash refund was not sanctioned."

๐Ÿ” ๐—™๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐˜๐˜€: ๐—–๐—ผ๐—บ๐—ฝ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜†: M/s. Scope International (P) Ltd. ๐—œ๐˜€๐˜€๐˜‚๐—ฒ: Should the respondent reverse the credit due to denial of cash refund, and can credit be denied due to unregistered premises?

๐—”๐—ฐ๐˜๐—ถ๐˜ƒ๐—ถ๐˜๐˜†: The respondent, exporting IT services without tax, claimed refunds for unutilized Cenvat credit. Part of the refund claim was denied, with the original authority directing them to reverse the credit.

โš–๏ธ ๐—๐˜‚๐—ฑ๐—ด๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜: The Tribunal ruled that since the respondent had already debited the credit when filing the refund, an additional reversal was unnecessary. The Commissioner (Appeals) permitted re-credit for the denied refund amount. The department's appeal, citing premises registration and input-output nexus, lacked merit. The appeal was dismissed.

๐—–๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐—œ๐—ป๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป: ๐—ง๐—ถ๐˜๐—น๐—ฒ: Commissioner of GST & Central Excise vs. M/s. Scope International (P) Ltd. ๐—ฆ๐—˜๐—ฅ๐—ฉ๐—œ๐—–๐—˜ ๐—ง๐—”๐—ซ ๐—”๐—ฃ๐—ฃ๐—˜๐—”๐—Ÿ ๐—ก๐—ผ๐˜€. 40590-40593 OF 2014 ๐—ข๐—ฟ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐——๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฒ: 10 October 2023 ๐Ÿ“œ This ruling clarifies that Cenvat credit reversal isnโ€™t warranted solely due to unapproved cash refunds and that premises registration is not grounds for credit denial.

More from @abhishekrajaramReply on Twitter

Page created with TweetHunter

Write your own