Abhishek Raja "Ram"

@abhishekrajaram

8 months ago

•View on X

š—–š—²š˜€š˜š—®š˜ š—–š—µš—²š—»š—»š—®š—¶ š—¢š—æš—±š—²š—æ: š—”š—¼ š—¦š—²š—æš˜ƒš—¶š—°š—² š—§š—®š˜… š—Ÿš—¶š—®š—Æš—¶š—¹š—¶š˜š˜† š—³š—¼š—æ š—–š—æš—¶š—°š—øš—²š˜ š—¦š—½š—¼š—æš˜š—¶š—»š—“ š—”š—°š˜š—¶š˜ƒš—¶š˜š—¶š—²š˜€ šŸ“¢ š—§š—µš—² š—§š—æš—¶š—Æš˜‚š—»š—®š—¹ š—µš—²š—¹š—±: "Managing and organizing cricket-related activities cannot be considered a business for Service Tax purposes. Appeal allowed."

šŸ” š—™š—®š—°š˜š˜€: š—”š—½š—½š—²š—¹š—¹š—®š—»š˜: M/s. Tamil Nadu Cricket Association š—œš˜€š˜€š˜‚š—²: The appellant provided stadium and support services for IPL matches in Chennai. The Department proposed Service Tax on Rs. 10,00,00,000/- received from BCCI, considering it as "Support Services of Business or Commerce."

āš–ļø š—š˜‚š—±š—“š—²š—ŗš—²š—»š˜: The Tribunal ruled that the Department failed to prove an agreement between the appellant and BCCI for the received sum. It emphasized that Service Tax applies only when a service is provided for consideration. Citing the Rajasthan Cricket Association case, it confirmed that BCCI's activities aren't considered commercial for tax purposes.

šŸ“œ š—–š—®š˜€š—² š—œš—»š—³š—¼š—æš—ŗš—®š˜š—¶š—¼š—»: š—§š—¶š˜š—¹š—²: M/s. Tamil Nadu Cricket Association vs. The Commissioner of Service Tax š—¢š—æš—±š—²š—æ š——š—®š˜š—²: 20 February 2023 🚩 š—œš—ŗš—½š—¹š—¶š—°š—®š˜š—¶š—¼š—»: BCCI's cricket-related activities are not considered "business or commerce," so no Service Tax is applicable on associated payments.

More from @abhishekrajaramReply on X

Page created with TweetHunter

Write your own